Cited by 174Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAmino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism

Glutamate–glutamine cycling in Alzheimer's disease

WALTON, H, DODD, P·2007·Neurochemistry International

Abstract

In addition to its definitive pathological characteristics, neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain exhibits regionally variable neuronal loss and synaptic dysfunction that are likely to underlie the symptomatic memory loss and language abnormalities. A number of mechanisms that could give rise to this localized damage have been proposed, amongst which excitotoxicity figures prominently. This is the process, well attested in experimental systems, whereby brain cells are excited to death by the pathophysiological action of the brain's most-abundant excitatory transmitter, glutamate. Glutamate transmission is mediated by a range of ionotropic and metabotropic receptors which, when activated, can lead to depolarization and increased intracellular Ca2+ ion concentration in the cells on which they are located. The action of glutamate is terminated by its removal from these receptor sites by transport into nearby cells, most commonly perisynaptic astrocytes. There it is converted to physiologically inert glutamine and shuttled back to excitatory nerve terminals. Malfunctions in components of the glutamate-glutamine cycle could result in a self-perpetuating neuronal death cascade mediated by glutamate. The approval by the FDA of an ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonist to treat late-stage AD has led to renewed interest in the contribution of altered glutamatergic neurotransmission to disease pathogenesis. This review encompasses those aspects…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuint.2006.10.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 215 · Cited by 174

Authors
WALTON, H., & DODD, P.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
WALTON, H
ORCID
DODD, P
Venue
Neurochemistry International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
50
Issue
7-8
Pages
1052-1066
ISSN
0197-0186 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983540399
Cited by
174
References
215
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurochemistry International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, glutamate-glutamine cycle, glutamate excitotoxicity, glutamatergic neurotransmission, astrocytes, glutamate uptake, ionotropic glutamate receptors, metabotropic glutamate receptors, intracellular calcium, neuronal cell death, glutamine, glutamate receptor antagonists
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Cell Membrane, Glutamine, Humans, Models, Neurological, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Receptors, Glutamate, Receptors, AMPA, Receptors, Kainic Acid, Kainic Acid Receptors, Glutamic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review