Cited by 81Visual perception and processing mechanismsBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionMotor Control and Adaptation

Mechanisms underlying visually induced body sway

Guerraz, Michel, Bronstein, Adolfo M.·2008·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between visually induced perceptual illusions of body motion (vection) and visually induced postural responses (VEPRs). Ten standing healthy subjects were tested in two visual conditions known to induce directionally opposite VEPRs: subjects fixated either a static head-mounted or an earth-fixed visual display in front of a horizontally translating visual background. The VEPR was in the direction of background motion when fixating the head-mounted display but transiently reversed in the earth-fixed condition. In contrast, vection occurred in only one direction (opposite to background motion) and developed later than VEPRs. The different time course and in-congruency between direction of VEPRs and direction of vection suggests that perceptual and postural responses are not causally related. However, since vection did increase VEPR magnitude in the direction of background motion, we postulate that VEPRs might be mediated by two different mechanisms: (1) a short latency system, driven by transient visual stimuli and sensitive to visual geometry (parallax-no parallax), responsible for automatic postural sway adjustments and (2) a longer latency, vection-enhanced postural mechanism, related to the conscious perception of self-motion during longer duration (locomotor, vehicular) body displacements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.07.053

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Postural instability can occur well before the onset of vection and is not necessarily coincident or consistent with the direction of perceived self-motion.

    “In fact, postural instability can occur well before the onset of vection and is not necessarily coincident or consistent with the direction of perceived self-motion (Guerraz and Bronstein, 2008; Wang et al., 2010).”

    From Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? (2015) · cites this paper as Guerraz and Bronstein, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guerraz, M., & Bronstein, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Charing Cross Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Guerraz, Michel
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
443
Issue
1
Pages
12-16
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068385459
Cited by
81
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
vection, postural sway, postural control, head-mounted displays, parallax, self-motion perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Postural Balance, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motion Perception, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Posture, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Head Movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review