Artificial vision through neuronal stimulation
Abstract
Introduction The term visual prosthesis refers to any device capable of eliciting visual percepts in an individual through electrical stimulation of any part of the visual system.Background Blindness can be due to eye pathology or due to damage of the lateral geniculate or visual cortex. Eye pathology other than diseases that affect the cornea and lens are numerous and some of the leading causes are diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, retinal detachment, glaucoma, and retinal vascular occlusions. The visual prosthesis can be divided into non-retinal and retinal approaches. Non-retinal approaches include cortical and optic nerve prosthesis. Retinal approaches are aimed at eye pathologies in which at least part of the optic nerve remains intact whereas when the optic nerve is nearly completely damaged and/or the eye itself is disfigured or degenerated then a non-retinal approach is warranted. The retinal prosthesis can be placed on the surface of the retina, in the subretinal space or in the suprachoroidal space.Results Several independent groups related variable degrees of success in promoting visual sensations through electrical stimulation of the visual system. Every technique, equipment and anatomical target has its advantages and disadvantages, and the biological/electrical-mechanical interface is still the aspect of the research towards a chronic, long term, reliable biomimetic implant.Conclusions The visual prostheses have achieved significant developments in recent years. We see continued improvement in visual acuity with increasing number and density of electrodes. Even though the visual acuity is still poor relative to normal vision, these subjects can read letters using their implants. Perhaps more importantly, blind patients can use these devices for mobility and orientation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The complexity of the visual cortex with neurons specifically tuned for specific cues could hinder the ability to evoke simple uniformly shaped phosphenes.
“On the other hand, the complexity of the visual cortex with neurons specifically tuned for specific cues [95] could hinder the ability to evoke simple uniformly shaped phosphenes.”
From Advances in visual prostheses: engineering and biological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [95]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Fernandes, R. A. B., Diniz, B., Ribeiro, R., & Humayun, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- Neuroscience Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 519
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 122-128
- ISSN
- 0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026096187
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- visual prosthesis, retinal prosthesis, blindness, retinal degeneration, visual acuity, electrode density, biomimetic implants, visual perception
- MeSH terms
- Blindness, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Humans, Neurons, Visual Prosthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review