Cited by 46Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Fear extinction and memory reconsolidation as critical components in behavioral treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder and potential augmentation of these processes

Smith, Noelle B., Doran, Jennifer M., Sippel, Lauren M., Harpaz-Rotem, Ilan·2017·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with alterations in critical brain regions such as the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex. This brief review has two objectives: (1) to discuss research examining extinction and reconsolidation processes as mechanisms in PTSD psychotherapy, and (2) present possibilities for augmenting extinction and reconsolidation within treatment through alterations to therapeutic interventions and novel approaches. A key component of many effective PTSD therapies is exposure, which involves intentional confrontation and processing of the traumatic memory. Our review suggests that extinction and reconsolidation processes underlie effective exposure-based treatment, but the neurobiological mechanisms of these processes in behavioral treatments for PTSD remains unclear. We argue that enhancing extinction and/or disrupting reconsolidation of a feared memory may improve the efficacy of existing treatments (e.g., increased change for limited/non-responders, faster/greater changes for responders), which can be done through multiple channels. Potential avenues for augmentation of the processes of extinction and reconsolidation in PTSD psychotherapies are reviewed, including behavioral modifications, pharmacotherapy agents, and the use of devices during therapy. We further suggest that investigations towards understanding the extent to which extinction and reconsolidation processes are necessary in effective PTSD psychotherapy is an impor…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.01.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 103 · Cited by 46

Authors
Smith, N. B., Doran, J. M., Sippel, L. M., & Harpaz-Rotem, I.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
649
Pages
170-175
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2570615884
Cited by
46
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, fear extinction, memory reconsolidation, exposure therapy, trauma-focused psychotherapy, augmentation therapy, pharmacotherapy, non-invasive brain stimulation, amygdala, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, traumatic memory
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Animals, Brain, Conditioning, Classical, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Humans, Psychotherapy, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review