Cited by 90Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Targeting tau: clinical trials and novel therapeutic approaches

Open access
VandeVrede, Lawren, Boxer, Adam L., Polydoro, Manuela·2020·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Tauopathies are a group of over 20 clinicopathological neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common type of dementia, progressive supranuclear palsy, Pick's disease, corticobasal degeneration, among others. Tauopathies are defined by neurodegeneration and the presence of tau aggregates in affected brains regions. Interestingly, regional tau aggregation burden correlates with clinical phenotype and predicts cognitive status. Autosomal dominant mutations in the MAPT gene lead to tau deposition and clinical FTD syndromes with cognitive, behavioral, and motor impairment. Polymorphisms in or around the MAPT gene have also been strongly linked to other proteinopathies including synucleinopathies. Taken together these findings suggests that tau plays a critical role in neurodegeneration and proteinopathies, supporting the idea that tau targeted approaches can be disease-modifying and lead to clinically meaningful benefits in slowing or reversing disease progression. Increasingly, human clinical trials are testing this hypothesis. This article reviews tau-targeted therapies tested in clinical trials as well as agents currently in active development based on publicly disclosed information. We describe the therapeutic approaches of these trials based on the potential pathogenic mechanism they target.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.134919

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 129 · Cited by 90

Authors
VandeVrede, L., Boxer, A. L., & Polydoro, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Casma Therapeutics (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Polydoro, Manuela
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
731
Pages
134919
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3022217792
Cited by
90
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (5T32AG023481, 5R01AG038791-09, 1U19AG063911-01)
  • Tau Consortium
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
tau-targeted therapy, tauopathy, Alzheimer's disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, Pick's disease, corticobasal degeneration, MAPT mutations, frontotemporal dementia, tau aggregation, proteinopathies, synucleinopathies, disease-modifying therapy, clinical trials, drug development
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, tau Proteins, Tauopathies, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review