Cited by 27Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

PPARγ activation suppresses the expression of MMP9 by downregulating NF-κB post intracerebral hemorrhage

Luo, Xingmei, Wu, Jing, Wu, Guofeng·2021·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARγ) is critical in protecting against inflammatory and oxidative stresses post brain injury. We have previously reported that rosiglitazone, an agonist of PPARγ, was effective to prevent microglia from apoptosis and ameliorate neuronal injuries post intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) with suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9) expression. However, molecular mechanisms linking how PPARγ decreases MMP9 remain unknown. Here, we hypothesize that PPARγ downregulates MMP9 expression post hemorrhage by inhibiting nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), an upstream regulator of MMPs gene and also key transcription factor involved in the control of immune and neuroinflammatory responses. We found both in vivo and in vitro that PPARγ was significantly downregulated post ICH with prominent increases of NF-κB and MMP9. Activation of PPARγ using rosiglitazone decreased the expression of both NF-κB and MMP9, while reversed effects were observed when administrating the PPARγ antagonist GW9662. Besides, inhibiting NF-κB by JSH-23 also suppressed the expression of MMP9, with only limited effect on PPARγ. Further studies revealed prominent colocalizations of NF-κB with PPARγ and MMP9, respectively. Finally, direct interactions of NF-κB with PPARγ and MMP9 gene were also confirmed, respectively, by protein and chromatin immunoprecipitations. These results suggested a role of NF-κB in mediating the reduction of MMP9 by PPARγ, potentially providi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135770

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, X., Wu, J., & Wu, G.
Affiliations
  • Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University (CN)
  • Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Wu, Guofeng
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
752
Pages
135770
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3131855476
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971126/H0906)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
PPARγ, NF-κB, MMP-9, intracerebral hemorrhage, rosiglitazone, GW9662, JSH-23, neuroinflammation, microglia, transcriptional regulation, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Rosiglitazone, Anilides, Animals, Cell Line, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Male, Phenylenediamines, Down-Regulation, NF-kappa B, Matrix Metalloproteinase 9, PPAR gamma, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review