Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enrichment of the erythrocyte miR-451a in brain extracellular vesicles following impairment of the blood-brain barrier

Koopaei, Nasser Nassiri, Chowdhury, Ekram Ahmed, Jiang, Jinmai, Noorani, Behnam, da Silva, Lais, Bulut, Gamze, Hakimjavadi, Hesamedin, Chamala, Srikar, Bickel, Ulrich, Schmittgen, Thomas D.·2021·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Extracellular RNAs (exRNAs) are present in all biofluids and incorporate many types of RNAs including miRNA. To enhance their stability outside of the cell, exRNAs are bound within ribonucleoprotein complexes or packaged into extracellular vesicles (EVs). The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a dynamic interface between the systemic circulation and the CNS and is responsible for maintaining a stable extracellular environment for CNS cells. The intent of this study was to determine if EVs and their contents are transferred from the peripheral circulation to the CNS under conditions of an impaired BBB. The BBB of mice was disrupted by unilateral intracarotid artery infusion with hyperosmolar mannitol solution. To validate barrier opening, the uptake clearance of [ 13 C 12 ]-sucrose in the left forebrain (i.e. the ipsilateral, mannitol injected hemisphere) was quantified and revealed a 14-fold increase in the mannitol perfused hemisphere compared to sham treated mice. EVs were isolated from the extracellular spaces of the left forebrain following gentle tissue lysis and differential ultracentrifugation. EVs were confirmed using nanotracking analysis, electron microscopy and western blotting. qRT-PCR showed that the erythrocyte-enriched miR-451a in brain tissue EVs increased with mannitol treatment by 24-fold. Small RNA sequencing performed on the EVs isolated from the sham and mannitol treated mice showed that miR-9-5p was the most abundant miRNA contained within the brain EVs. qRT-P…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135829

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Alqahtani, 2018, Brain uptake of [(13)C] and [(14)C]Sucrose quantified by microdialysis and whole tissue analysis in mice, Drug Metab. Dispos., 46, 1514, 10.1124/dmd.118.082909 · DOI
  2. Azzouzi, 2015, Deep sequencing and proteomic analysis of the microRNA-induced silencing complex in human red blood cells, Exp. Hematol., 43, 382, 10.1016/j.exphem.2015.01.007 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Batool, 2019, Altered biogenesis and MicroRNA content of hippocampal exosomes following experimental status epilepticus, Front. Neurosci., 13, 1404, 10.3389/fnins.2019.01404 · DOI
  4. Bhomia, 2016, A panel of serum MiRNA biomarkers for the diagnosis of severe to mild traumatic brain injury in humans, Sci. Rep., 6, 28148, 10.1038/srep28148 · DOI
  5. Bickel, 2005, How to measure drug transport across the blood-brain barrier, NeuroRx, 2, 15, 10.1602/neurorx.2.1.15 · DOI
  6. Chowdhury, 2018, Simultaneous UPLC-MS/MS analysis of two stable isotope labeled versions of sucrose in mouse plasma and brain samples as markers of blood-brain barrier permeability and brain vascular space, J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci., 1073, 19, 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.12.007 · DOI
  7. Davis, 2013, Kraken: a set of tools for quality control and analysis of high-throughput sequence data, Methods, 63, 41, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.06.027 · DOI
  8. Gildea, 2013, Urinary exosome miRNome analysis and its applications to salt sensitivity of blood pressure, Clin. Biochem., 46, 1131, 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.05.052 · DOI
  9. Hunter, 2008, Detection of microRNA expression in human peripheral blood microvesicles, PLoS One, 3, e3694, 10.1371/journal.pone.0003694 · DOI
  10. Ji, 2016, Increased brain-specific MiR-9 and MiR-124 in the serum exosomes of acute ischemic stroke patients, PLoS One, 11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0163645 · DOI
  11. Koga, 2010, MicroRNA expression profiling of exfoliated colonocytes isolated from feces for colorectal cancer screening, Cancer Prev. Res., 3, 1435, 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0036 · DOI
  12. Kozomara, 2019, miRBase: from microRNA sequences to function, Nucleic Acids Res., 47, D155, 10.1093/nar/gky1141 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Kroll, 1998, Outwitting the blood-brain barrier for therapeutic purposes: osmotic opening and other means, Neurosurgery, 42, 1083, 10.1097/00006123-199805000-00082 · DOI
  14. Lee, 2017, Inhibition of miR-203 reduces spontaneous recurrent seizures in mice, Mol. Neurobiol., 54, 3300, 10.1007/s12035-016-9901-7 · DOI
  15. Liebner, 2018, Functional morphology of the blood-brain barrier in health and disease, Acta Neuropathol., 135, 311, 10.1007/s00401-018-1815-1 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Link, 2010, Fecal MicroRNAs as novel biomarkers for colon cancer screening, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 19, 1766, 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0027 · DOI
  17. Love, 2014, Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2, Genome Biol., 15, 550, 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · DOI · Paper page
  18. McKeever, 2018, MicroRNA expression levels are altered in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with young-onset Alzheimer’s disease, Mol. Neurobiol., 10.1007/s12035-018-1032-x · DOI · Paper page
  19. Miah, 2016, Development and validation of a sensitive UPLC-MS/MS method for the quantitation of [(13)C]sucrose in rat plasma, blood, and brain: its application to the measurement of blood-brain barrier permeability, J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci., 1015-1016, 105, 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.02.017 · DOI
  20. Miah, 2017, Evaluation of [(14)C] and [(13)C]sucrose as blood-brain barrier permeability markers, J. Pharm. Sci., 106, 1659, 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.02.011 · DOI
  21. Neuwelt, 1979, Osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption: a new means of increasing chemotherapeutic agent delivery, Trans. Am. Neurol. Assoc., 104, 256
  22. Neuwelt, 1979, Osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption. Computerized tomographic monitoring of chemotherapeutic agent delivery, J. Clin. Invest., 64, 684, 10.1172/JCI109509 · DOI
  23. Neuwelt, 1986, Osmotic blood-brain barrier opening to IgM monoclonal antibody in the rat, Am. J. Physiol., 250, R875
  24. Neuwelt, 1984, Modification of the blood-brain barrier in the chemotherapy of malignant brain tumors, Fed. Proc., 43, 214
  25. Neuwelt, 1987, Increased delivery of tumor-specific monoclonal antibodies to brain after osmotic blood-brain barrier modification in patients with melanoma metastatic to the central nervous system, Neurosurgery, 20, 885, 10.1227/00006123-198706000-00011 · DOI
  26. Neuwelt, 1994, Delivery of virus-sized iron oxide particles to rodent CNS neurons, Neurosurgery, 34, 777
  27. Patz, 2013, More than cell dust: microparticles isolated from cerebrospinal fluid of brain injured patients are messengers carrying mRNAs, miRNAs, and proteins, J. Neurotrauma, 30, 1232, 10.1089/neu.2012.2596 · DOI
  28. Raoof, 2017, Cerebrospinal fluid microRNAs are potential biomarkers of temporal lobe epilepsy and status epilepticus, Sci. Rep., 7, 3328, 10.1038/s41598-017-02969-6 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Rapoport, 1980, Quantitative aspects of reversible osmotic opening of the blood-brain barrier, Am. J. Physiol., 238, R421
  30. Street, 2012, Dear, Identification and proteomic profiling of exosomes in human cerebrospinal fluid, J. Transl. Med., 10, 5, 10.1186/1479-5876-10-5 · DOI
  31. Stylli, 2017, miRNA expression profiling of cerebrospinal fluid in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, J. Neurosurg., 126, 1131, 10.3171/2016.1.JNS151454 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Takasato, 1984, An in situ brain perfusion technique to study cerebrovascular transport in the rat, Am. J. Physiol., 247, H484
  33. Thery, 2018, Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines, J. Extracell. Vesicles, 7, 10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Tomkovich, 2020, Human Colon Mucosal biofilms and murine host communicate via altered mRNA and microRNA expression during cancer, mSystems, 5, 10.1128/msystems.00451-19 · DOI
  35. Truettner, 2011, Therapeutic hypothermia alters microRNA responses to traumatic brain injury in rats, J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 31, 1897, 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.33 · DOI
  36. Vella, 2017, A rigorous method to enrich for exosomes from brain tissue, J. Extracell. Vesicles, 6, 10.1080/20013078.2017.1348885 · DOI
  37. Vitsios, 2015, Chimira: analysis of small RNA sequencing data and microRNA modifications, Bioinformatics, 31, 3365, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv380 · DOI
  38. Yagi, 2017, Next-generation sequencing-based small RNA profiling of cerebrospinal fluid exosomes, Neurosci. Lett., 636, 48, 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.10.042 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
Koopaei, N. N., Chowdhury, E. A., Jiang, J., Noorani, B., da Silva, L., Bulut, G., Hakimjavadi, H., Chamala, S., Bickel, U., & Schmittgen, T. D.
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
751
Pages
135829
ISSN
0304-3940
Cited by
13
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review