Early Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis based on EEG spectral images using deep learning
Abstract
Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a proceeding hot issue along with a sharp upward trend in the incidence rate. Recently, early diagnosis of AD employing Electroencephalogram (EEG) as a specific hallmark has been an increasingly significant hot topic area. In consideration of the limited size of available EEG spectral images, how to extract more abstract features for better generalization still remains tremendously troubling. In this paper, we demonstrate that it can be settled well with multi-task learning strategy based on discriminative convolutional high-order Boltzmann Machine with hybrid feature maps. First, differently from our original model - Contractive Slab and Spike Convolutional Deep Boltzmann Machine (CssCDBM), we directly conduct EEG spectral image classification via inducing label layer, resulting in a discriminative version of CssCDBM, referred to as DCssCDBM. This demonstrates DCssCDBM can be extended well into the classification model instead of feature extractor alone previously. Then, the most important approach innovation is that we train our DCssCDBM with multi-task learning framework via EEG spectral images based Identification and verification tasks for overfitting reduction for the first time, which could increase the inter-subject variations and reduce the intra-subject variations respectively, both of which are essential to early diagnosis of AD. The proposed method shows the better ability of high-level representations extraction and demonstrates the advanced results over several state-of-the-art methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The above CNN applications on AD classification focus more on learning locally and continuously changed multiscaled features on the Euclidean space from EEG signals, neglecting functional connectivity features.
“The above CNN applications on AD classification (Bi & Wang, 2019; Deepthi et al., 2020; Huggins et al., 2021; Ieracitano et al., 2019; Li, Wang, et al., 2021) focus more on learning the locally and continuously changed multiscaled features on the Euclidean space from the EEG signals, neglecting the functional connectivity features.”
From <scp>Spatial–temporal</scp> graph convolutional network for Alzheimer classification based on brain functional connectivity imaging of electroencephalogram (2022) · cites this paper as Bi & Wang, 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 169
- Authors
- Bi, X., & Wang, H.
- Affiliations
- Minzu University of China (CN)
- Harbin Engineering University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Haibo
- Venue
- Neural Networks
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 114
- Pages
- 119-135
- ISSN
- 0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2922045303
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 9.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51779050)
- International S&T Cooperation Program of China (2015DFG12150)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- multi-task learning, discriminative feature extraction, overfitting reduction, interindividual variability, intra-subject variation
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Alzheimer Disease, Electroencephalography, Humans, Early Diagnosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review