Cited by 169EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchEmotion and Mood Recognition

Early Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis based on EEG spectral images using deep learning

Bi, Xiaojun, Wang, Haibo·2019·Neural Networks

Abstract

Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a proceeding hot issue along with a sharp upward trend in the incidence rate. Recently, early diagnosis of AD employing Electroencephalogram (EEG) as a specific hallmark has been an increasingly significant hot topic area. In consideration of the limited size of available EEG spectral images, how to extract more abstract features for better generalization still remains tremendously troubling. In this paper, we demonstrate that it can be settled well with multi-task learning strategy based on discriminative convolutional high-order Boltzmann Machine with hybrid feature maps. First, differently from our original model - Contractive Slab and Spike Convolutional Deep Boltzmann Machine (CssCDBM), we directly conduct EEG spectral image classification via inducing label layer, resulting in a discriminative version of CssCDBM, referred to as DCssCDBM. This demonstrates DCssCDBM can be extended well into the classification model instead of feature extractor alone previously. Then, the most important approach innovation is that we train our DCssCDBM with multi-task learning framework via EEG spectral images based Identification and verification tasks for overfitting reduction for the first time, which could increase the inter-subject variations and reduce the intra-subject variations respectively, both of which are essential to early diagnosis of AD. The proposed method shows the better ability of high-level representations extraction and demonstrates the advanced results over several state-of-the-art methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.02.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The above CNN applications on AD classification focus more on learning locally and continuously changed multiscaled features on the Euclidean space from EEG signals, neglecting functional connectivity features.

    “The above CNN applications on AD classification (Bi & Wang, 2019; Deepthi et al., 2020; Huggins et al., 2021; Ieracitano et al., 2019; Li, Wang, et al., 2021) focus more on learning the locally and continuously changed multiscaled features on the Euclidean space from the EEG signals, neglecting the functional connectivity features.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 169

Authors
Bi, X., & Wang, H.
Affiliations
  • Minzu University of China (CN)
  • Harbin Engineering University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Haibo
Venue
Neural Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
114
Pages
119-135
ISSN
0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2922045303
Cited by
169
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51779050)
  • International S&T Cooperation Program of China (2015DFG12150)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
multi-task learning, discriminative feature extraction, overfitting reduction, interindividual variability, intra-subject variation
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Alzheimer Disease, Electroencephalography, Humans, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review