Cited by 16Machine Learning in HealthcareSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Multimodal fusion network for ICU patient outcome prediction

Wang, Chutong, Yang, Xuebing, Sun, Mengxuan, Gu, Yifan, Niu, Jinghao, Zhang, Wensheng·2024·Neural Networks

Abstract

Over the past decades, massive Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have been accumulated in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and many other healthcare scenarios. The rich and comprehensive information recorded presents an exceptional opportunity for patient outcome predictions. Nevertheless, due to the diversity of data modalities, EHRs exhibit a heterogeneous characteristic, raising a difficulty to organically leverage information from various modalities. It is an urgent need to capture the underlying correlations among different modalities. In this paper, we propose a novel framework named Multimodal Fusion Network (MFNet) for ICU patient outcome prediction. First, we incorporate multiple modality-specific encoders to learn different modality representations. Notably, a graph guided encoder is designed to capture underlying global relationships among medical codes, and a text encoder with pre-fine-tuning strategy is adopted to extract appropriate text representations. Second, we propose to pairwise merge multimodal representations with a tailored hierarchical fusion mechanism. The experiments conducted on the eICU-CRD dataset validate that MFNet achieves superior performance on mortality prediction and Length of Stay (LoS) prediction compared with various representative and state-of-the-art baselines. Moreover, comprehensive ablation study demonstrates the effectiveness of each component of MFNet.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106672

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attention mechanisms such as gated attention, cross-attention, or transformer encoders are increasingly adopted in multimodal AI.

    “attention mechanisms such as gated attention [40,41], cross-attention [42–45], or transformer encoders [20,36,46–49] are increasingly adopted.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, C., Yang, X., Sun, M., Gu, Y., Niu, J., & Zhang, W.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Yang, Xuebing
  • Zhang, Wensheng
Venue
Neural Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
180
Pages
106672
ISSN
0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402024614
Cited by
16
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
multimodal fusion, electronic health records, mortality prediction, length of stay prediction, hierarchical fusion, multimodal representation learning
MeSH terms
Humans, Intensive Care Units, Length of Stay, Neural Networks, Computer, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review