Multimodal fusion network for ICU patient outcome prediction
Abstract
Over the past decades, massive Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have been accumulated in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and many other healthcare scenarios. The rich and comprehensive information recorded presents an exceptional opportunity for patient outcome predictions. Nevertheless, due to the diversity of data modalities, EHRs exhibit a heterogeneous characteristic, raising a difficulty to organically leverage information from various modalities. It is an urgent need to capture the underlying correlations among different modalities. In this paper, we propose a novel framework named Multimodal Fusion Network (MFNet) for ICU patient outcome prediction. First, we incorporate multiple modality-specific encoders to learn different modality representations. Notably, a graph guided encoder is designed to capture underlying global relationships among medical codes, and a text encoder with pre-fine-tuning strategy is adopted to extract appropriate text representations. Second, we propose to pairwise merge multimodal representations with a tailored hierarchical fusion mechanism. The experiments conducted on the eICU-CRD dataset validate that MFNet achieves superior performance on mortality prediction and Length of Stay (LoS) prediction compared with various representative and state-of-the-art baselines. Moreover, comprehensive ablation study demonstrates the effectiveness of each component of MFNet.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Attention mechanisms such as gated attention, cross-attention, or transformer encoders are increasingly adopted in multimodal AI.
“attention mechanisms such as gated attention [40,41], cross-attention [42–45], or transformer encoders [20,36,46–49] are increasingly adopted.”
From Multimodal Artificial Intelligence for Precision Critical Care: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [42]
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 48,293 · see citing works
Multimodal deep learning models for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease stage
Venugopalan, J., Tong, L., Hassanzadeh, H. R., & Wang, M. D. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74399-w · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Zhao, F., Zhang, C., & Geng, B. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3649447 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence-based methods for fusion of electronic health records and imaging data
Mohsen, F., Ali, H., El Hajj, N., & Shah, Z. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22514-4 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
BreastScreening-AI: Evaluating medical intelligent agents for human-AI interactions
Calisto, F. M., Santiago, C., Nunes, N., & Nascimento, J. C. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102285 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Predicting Patient Outcomes with Graph Representation Learning
Tong, C., Rocheteau, E., Veličković, P., Lane, N., & Liò, P. (2022) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-93080-6_20 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multimodal Artificial Intelligence for Precision Critical Care: A Scoping Review
Yang, M., Shi, N., Chen, H., Po, E. Y. P., Ng, P. Y., Lai, P. C. K., Wu, Y.-C., & Fong, D. Y. T. (2026) · Health Data Science · doi:10.34133/hds.0356 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“In this review, only 8 studies performed independent external validation [ 38 , 41 , 42 , 46 , 63 , 93 , 113 , 114 ], revealing an average 3.5% decrease in AUC on external datasets.”
Influential
- Authors
- Wang, C., Yang, X., Sun, M., Gu, Y., Niu, J., & Zhang, W.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Xuebing
- Zhang, Wensheng
- Venue
- Neural Networks
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-12
- Volume
- 180
- Pages
- 106672
- ISSN
- 0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402024614
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- multimodal fusion, electronic health records, mortality prediction, length of stay prediction, hierarchical fusion, multimodal representation learning
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Intensive Care Units, Length of Stay, Neural Networks, Computer, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review