Radiological classification of dementia from anatomical MRI assisted by machine learning-derived maps
Open accessAbstract
Background and purpose Many artificial intelligence tools are currently being developed to assist diagnosis of dementia from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, these tools have so far been difficult to integrate in the clinical routine workflow. In this work, we propose a new simple way to use them and assess their utility for improving diagnostic accuracy. Materials and methods We studied 34 patients with early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD), 49 with late-onset AD (LOAD), 39 with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and 24 with depression from the pre-existing cohort CLIN-AD. Support vector machine (SVM) automatic classifiers using 3D T1 MRI were trained to distinguish: LOAD vs. Depression, FTD vs. LOAD, EOAD vs. Depression, EOAD vs. FTD. We extracted SVM weight maps, which are tridimensional representations of discriminant atrophy patterns used by the classifier to take its decisions and we printed posters of these maps. Four radiologists (2 senior neuroradiologists and 2 unspecialized junior radiologists) performed a visual classification of the 4 diagnostic pairs using 3D T1 MRI. Classifications were performed twice: first with standard radiological reading and then using SVM weight maps as a guide. Results Diagnostic performance was significantly improved by the use of the weight maps for the two junior radiologists in the case of FTD vs. EOAD. Improvement was over 10 points of diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion This tool can improve the diagnostic accuracy of junior radiologists and could be integrated in the clinical routine workflow.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A few studies have attempted to discern neuroimaging signatures unique to AD by contrasting them with other dementia types.
“A few studies have attempted to discern neuroimaging signatures unique to AD by contrasting them with other dementia types31–40.”
From AI-based differential diagnosis of dementia etiologies on multimodal data (2024) · cites this paper as [37]
Cites
Differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases using structural MRI data
Koikkalainen, J., Rhodius-Meester, H., Tolonen, A., Barkhof, F., Tijms, B., Lemstra, A. W., Tong, T., Guerrero, R., Schuh, A., Ledig, C., et al. (2016) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2016.02.019 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Möller, C., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., van der Flier, W. M., Versteeg, A., Tijms, B., de Munck, J. C., Hafkemeijer, A., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., van der Grond, J., van Swieten, J., et al. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150220 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Kim, J. P., Kim, J., Park, Y. H., Park, S. B., Lee, J. S., Yoo, S., Kim, E.-J., Kim, H. J., Na, D. L., Brown, J. A., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101811 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Tong, T., Ledig, C., Guerrero, R., Schuh, A., Koikkalainen, J., Tolonen, A., Rhodius, H., Barkhof, F., Tijms, B., Lemstra, A. W., et al. (2017) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.012 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Accuracy of MRI classification algorithms in a tertiary memory center clinical routine cohort
Morin, A., Samper-Gonzalez, J., Bertrand, A., Ströer, S., Dormont, D., Mendes, A., Coupé, P., Ahdidan, J., Lévy, M., Samri, D., et al. (2020) · Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-190594 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AI-based differential diagnosis of dementia etiologies on multimodal data
Xue, C., Kowshik, S. S., Lteif, D., Puducheri, S., Jasodanand, V. H., Zhou, O. T., Walia, A. S., Guney, O. B., Zhang, J. D., Poésy, S., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03118-z · Cited by 182 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chagué, P., Marro, B., Fadili, S., Houot, M., Morin, A., Samper-González, J., Beunon, P., Arrivé, L., Dormont, D., Dubois, B., Teichmann, M., Epelbaum, S., & Colliot, O.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Colliot, Olivier
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroradiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 412-418
- ISSN
- 0150-9861 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3025275860
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroradiology (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- dementia diagnosis, radiographic classification, early-onset Alzheimer's disease, late-onset Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, depression, T1-weighted imaging, junior radiologists, clinical workflow integration
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Alzheimer Disease, Artificial Intelligence, Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Frontotemporal Dementia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review