Cited by 31Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Radiological classification of dementia from anatomical MRI assisted by machine learning-derived maps

Open access
Chagué, Pierre, Marro, Béatrice, Fadili, Sarah, Houot, Marion, Morin, Alexandre, Samper-González, Jorge, Beunon, Paul, Arrivé, Lionel +5 more·2021·Journal of Neuroradiology

Abstract

Background and purpose Many artificial intelligence tools are currently being developed to assist diagnosis of dementia from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, these tools have so far been difficult to integrate in the clinical routine workflow. In this work, we propose a new simple way to use them and assess their utility for improving diagnostic accuracy. Materials and methods We studied 34 patients with early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD), 49 with late-onset AD (LOAD), 39 with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and 24 with depression from the pre-existing cohort CLIN-AD. Support vector machine (SVM) automatic classifiers using 3D T1 MRI were trained to distinguish: LOAD vs. Depression, FTD vs. LOAD, EOAD vs. Depression, EOAD vs. FTD. We extracted SVM weight maps, which are tridimensional representations of discriminant atrophy patterns used by the classifier to take its decisions and we printed posters of these maps. Four radiologists (2 senior neuroradiologists and 2 unspecialized junior radiologists) performed a visual classification of the 4 diagnostic pairs using 3D T1 MRI. Classifications were performed twice: first with standard radiological reading and then using SVM weight maps as a guide. Results Diagnostic performance was significantly improved by the use of the weight maps for the two junior radiologists in the case of FTD vs. EOAD. Improvement was over 10 points of diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion This tool can improve the diagnostic accuracy of junior radiologists and could be integrated in the clinical routine workflow.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurad.2020.04.004

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A few studies have attempted to discern neuroimaging signatures unique to AD by contrasting them with other dementia types.

    “A few studies have attempted to discern neuroimaging signatures unique to AD by contrasting them with other dementia types31–40.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chagué, P., Marro, B., Fadili, S., Houot, M., Morin, A., Samper-González, J., Beunon, P., Arrivé, L., Dormont, D., Dubois, B., Teichmann, M., Epelbaum, S., & Colliot, O.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
Corresponding author
Colliot, Olivier
Venue
Journal of Neuroradiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
412-418
ISSN
0150-9861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3025275860
Cited by
31
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroradiology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
dementia diagnosis, radiographic classification, early-onset Alzheimer's disease, late-onset Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, depression, T1-weighted imaging, junior radiologists, clinical workflow integration
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Alzheimer Disease, Artificial Intelligence, Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review