Cited by 44Pesticide Exposure and ToxicityToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Prenatal exposure to mirex impairs neurodevelopment at age of 4 years

Open access
Puertas, Raquel, Lopez-Espinosa, Maria-Jose, Cruz, Francisco, Ramos, Rosa, Freire, Carmen, Pérez-García, Miguel, Abril, Ana, Julvez, Jordi +2 more·2010·NeuroToxicology

Abstract

Background Some studies have suggested that certain organochlorine (OC) compounds may impair neurodevelopment in animals and humans. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between prenatal exposure to an OC pesticide, mirex, and cognitive development in children at age of 4 years. Methods A population-based birth cohort in Granada (Spain) recruited between 2000 and 2002 was studied between 2005 and 2006, when the children were 4 years old. Complete data for analyses, including mirex determination in placentas, were gathered on a random sample of 104 children. A standardized version of the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities (MSCA) was used to assess children's motor and cognitive abilities. Multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the relation between MSCA scores and prenatal exposure to mirex, adjusting for potential confounders. Results The presence of mirex in placenta was inversely associated with cognitive development at 4 years of age: children with prenatal exposure to mirex (>or=limit of quantification: 26%; median: 1.4 ng/g placenta) showed a decrease of 5.15 points in working memory and of 7.33 points in the quantitative area with respect to children of the same age not prenatally exposed to mirex. Conclusion The deficit found in intellectual function during early childhood suggests that prenatal exposure to mirex may have a significant impact on school performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuro.2009.09.009

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Puertas, R., Lopez-Espinosa, M.-J., Cruz, F., Ramos, R., Freire, C., Pérez-García, M., Abril, A., Julvez, J., Salvatierra, M., & Campoy, C.
Affiliations
Universidad de Granada (ES)
Venue
NeuroToxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
154-160
ISSN
0161-813X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062001745
Cited by
44
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroToxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Keywords
mirex, organochlorine pesticides, prenatal exposure, brain development, cognitive development, working memory, McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities, birth cohort
MeSH terms
Child Development, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Mirex, Neuropsychological Tests, Placenta, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Psychomotor Performance, Regression Analysis, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review