Cited by 391Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Synaptic pathology in Alzheimer's disease: a review of ultrastructural studies

Scheff, S·2003·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Morphologic studies of the neuropathology in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have demonstrated significant loss of synaptic connectivity in many regions of the neocortex and hippocampus. The strongest correlation with cognitive decline in AD is with the synaptic density. This article discusses the ultrastructural studies that have documented changes in synaptic numbers in many areas of association cortex and in the hippocampal dentate gyrus molecular layer. Changes in the synaptic complex are discussed as a possible compensatory mechanism in response to synapse loss and a model is proposed to help relate the significance of these synaptic changes. Comparisons are made between results observed with ultrastructural technique and those utilizing immunohistochemistry to assess changes in synaptic pathology. Possible reasons underlying the synaptic neuropathology are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.08.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • APP mutant neurons show differential alterations in synaptic proteins resembling those in AD brain, including early loss of synaptophysin and PSD-95.

    “Remarkably, APP mutant neurons showed differential alterations in synaptic proteins [3] that resembled those that have been described in AD brain, such as early loss of the pre-synaptic protein synaptophysin [113, 163, 192] and the post-synaptic protein PSD-95 [63].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 108 · Cited by 391

Authors
Scheff, S.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Scheff, S
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
1029-1046
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986295281
Cited by
391
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 24
FWCI
11.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Kentucky
  • National Institutes of Health (5r37ag012138-05, 5r01ag012986-03)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG12986, AG12138)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, synaptic pathology, synaptic loss, synaptic density, ultrastructure, hippocampus, dentate gyrus, association cortex, synaptic complex, compensatory mechanisms, cognitive decline, immunohistochemistry
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Nerve Degeneration, Synapses, Synaptic Membranes, Dentate Gyrus, Neocortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review