Cited by 260Nerve injury and regenerationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsPhysical Activity and Health

The exercise-induced expression of BDNF within the hippocampus varies across life-span

Adlard, Paul A., Perreau, Victoria M., Cotman, Carl W.·2005·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Voluntary exercise increases hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression in young animals. In this investigation we examined the induction of BDNF protein in the hippocampus of young (2 months), late middle-aged (15 months) and old (24 months) animals over 4 weeks of exercise. Average running distances decreased with age, with the old animals also maintaining a constant level of activity over time, whereas the other groups tended to increase their average running distance. All animals demonstrated a biphasic profile of BDNF protein induction, with a significant (P<0.05) increase after 1 week of exercise followed by a decrease to near sedentary levels at 2 weeks. After this, BDNF protein levels increased significantly (P<0.05), as compared to baseline, primarily only in the young animals. In whole hippocampal homogenates, only particular BDNF mRNA exons were significantly (P<0.05) changed as a result of exercise, with the largest induction occurring in young animals. BDNF protein induction may, therefore, not be directly correlated with significant mRNA changes. Exercise may represent a therapeutic tool for disorders which involve a decrease in BDNF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.05.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rodent studies demonstrate increased BDNF mRNA and BDNF protein within the hippocampus in response to wheel running for 1-8 weeks.

    “Rodent studies demonstrate increased BDNF mRNA and BDNF protein within the hippocampus in response to wheel running for 1-8 weeks (87-92).”

    From Muscle–Organ Crosstalk: The Emerging Roles of Myokines (2020) · cites this paper as [92]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 260

Authors
Adlard, P. A., Perreau, V. M., & Cotman, C. W.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Adlard, Paul A.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-04
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
511-520
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054397809
Cited by
260
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation
  • University of California, Irvine
  • National Institute on Aging (NIA-AG-13411-04)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, voluntary exercise, hippocampus, aging, lifespan, exercise-induced gene expression, running distance, neurotrophins, exercise therapy
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aging, Animals, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Exons, Gene Expression Regulation, Hippocampus, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Physical Conditioning, Animal, RNA, Messenger, Time Factors, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review