Cited by 299Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Age- and region-dependent alterations in Aβ-degrading enzymes: implications for Aβ-induced disorders

Caccamo, Antonella, Oddo, Salvatore, Sugarman, Michael C., Akbari, Yama, LaFerla, Frank M.·2005·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Accumulation of amyloid beta-protein (Abeta) is a fundamental feature of certain human brain disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Down syndrome and also of the skeletal muscle disorder inclusion body myositis (IBM). Emerging evidence suggests that the steady-state levels of Abeta are determined by the balance between production and degradation. Although the proteolytic processes leading to Abeta formation have been extensively studied, less is known about the proteases that degrade Abeta, which include insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) and neprilysin (NEP). Here we measured the steady-state levels of these proteases as a function of age and brain/muscle region in mice and humans. In the hippocampus, which is vulnerable to AD pathology, IDE and NEP steady-state levels diminish as function of age. By contrast, in the cerebellum, a brain region not marked by significant Abeta accumulation, NEP and IDE levels either increase or remain unaltered during aging. Moreover, the steady-state levels of IDE and NEP are significantly higher in the cerebellum compared to the cortex and hippocampus. We further show that IDE is more oxidized in the hippocampus compared to the cerebellum of AD patients. In muscle, we find differential levels of IDE and NEP in fast versus slow twitch muscle fibers that varies with aging. These findings suggest that age- and region-specific changes in the proteolytic clearance of Abeta represent a critical pathogenic mechanism that may account for the susceptibility of particular brain or muscle regions in AD and IBM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.06.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 299

Authors
Caccamo, A., Oddo, S., Sugarman, M. C., Akbari, Y., & LaFerla, F. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
LaFerla, Frank M.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
645-654
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153966730
Cited by
299
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG0212982, AG 26175)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
amyloid-beta, insulin-degrading enzyme, neprilysin, Alzheimer's disease, inclusion body myositis, Down syndrome, aging, hippocampus, cerebellum, muscle fiber type, protein oxidation, amyloid clearance
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Insulysin, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Muscles, Blotting, Western, Neprilysin, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Muscle, Skeletal, Immunoprecipitation, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review