Cited by 51Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Genetic association of low density lipoprotein receptor and Alzheimer's disease

Gopalraj, Rangaraj K., Zhu, Haiyan, Kelly, Jeremiah F., Mendiondo, Marta, Pulliam, Joseph F., Bennett, David A., Estus, Steven·2005·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

The low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) is an attractive candidate gene for genetic association with Alzheimer's disease (AD) because: (i) the LDLR is an apolipoprotein E (apoE) receptor, alleles of which have been associated with AD, (ii) LDLR resides at chromosome 19p13.3 within a region linked to AD, and (iii) LDLR modulates the homeostasis of cholesterol, which itself appears associated with AD. Therefore, we evaluated whether LDLR haplotypes alter the odds of AD by performing an association study examining three LDLR single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 118 AD patients and 133 non-AD subjects. LDLR genotypes were obtained by TaqMan allelic discrimination assays. Although individual LDLR SNPs were not associated with AD, analyses of unambiguous haplotypes suggested the hypothesis that the 211 LDLR haplotype was associated with reduced odds of AD. We then evaluated this hypothesis in a second study cohort, i.e., the Religious Orders Study. These results supported the hypothesis that the 211 LDLR haplotype is associated with reduced odds of AD. Moreover, these data suggested further associations between LDLR variants and AD. Thus, LDLR variants appear significantly associated with AD and merit additional study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.09.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gopalraj, R. K., Zhu, H., Kelly, J. F., Mendiondo, M., Pulliam, J. F., Bennett, D. A., & Estus, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Estus, Steven
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077592857
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (2P50AG05144-17, P50AG005144, R01AG021545, R01AG015819, P30AG010161, R01AG021362)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
LDL receptor, Alzheimer's disease, genetic association, single nucleotide polymorphisms, apolipoprotein E receptor, cholesterol homeostasis, Religious Orders Study, candidate genes
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Exons, Female, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Humans, Genetic Linkage, Male, Receptors, LDL, Genetic Variation, Case-Control Studies, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review