Urinary cortisol excretion as a predictor of incident cognitive impairment
Abstract
Elevated glucocorticoid levels have been associated with cognitive impairment, including dementia. However, few longitudinal studies have examined the association between resting cortisol levels and the incidence of cognitive impairment. We measured overnight urinary excretion of cortisol in 538 high-functioning men and women, 70-79 years of age, in 1988, and assessed their cognitive functioning in 1988, 1991, and 1995 using the short portable mental status questionnaire (SPMSQ). Compared to participants in the bottom quartile of urinary cortisol at baseline, those in the top three quartiles had higher risk of incident cognitive impairment over the 7-year follow up (i.e., decline in SPMSQ score to below six out of nine). This association was not affected by adjustment for age, gender, education level, ethnicity, smoking, prevalent cardiovascular disease, and blood pressure (adjusted odds ratio for the highest quartile 2.34, 95% confidence interval, 1.07-5.14). There was no effect modification by gender; the association was equally strong in men and women. We conclude that urinary excretion of cortisol predicts incident cognitive impairment in older men and women.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Elevated HPA and cardiovascular parameters are linked to poor cognitive functioning.
“Elevated HPA and cardiovascular parameters have also been linked to poor cognitive functioning in many studies.29,31,[49][50][51][52][53][54]”
From Socio‐economic differentials in peripheral biology: Cumulative allostatic load (2010) · cites this paper as [31]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 112
- Authors
- Karlamangla, A. S., Singer, B. H., Chodosh, J., McEwen, B. S., & Seeman, T. E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- Rockefeller University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Karlamangla, Arun S.
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Aging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-84
- ISSN
- 0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009494326
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ag017056-03)
- National Institute on Aging (1K12AG01004, AG17265, K12AG001004, P30AG017265, AG 17056)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Keywords
- urinary cortisol, glucocorticoids, cognitive impairment, dementia, older adults, biomarkers, dementia risk prediction, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Incidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review