Cited by 74Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Gray and white matter degeneration revealed by diffusion in an Alzheimer mouse model

Zerbi, Valerio, Kleinnijenhuis, Michiel, Fang, Xiaotian, Jansen, Diane, Veltien, Andor, Van Asten, Jack, Timmer, Nienke, Dederen, Pieter J. +2 more·2013·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

In patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) the severity of white matter degeneration correlates with the clinical symptoms of the disease. In this study, we performed diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging at ultra-high field in a mouse model for AD (APP(swe)/PS1(dE9)) in combination with a voxel-based approach and tractography to detect changes in water diffusivity in white and gray matter, because these reflect structural alterations in neural tissue. We found substantial changes in water diffusion parallel and perpendicular to axonal tracts in several white matter regions like corpus callosum and fimbria of the hippocampus, that match with previous findings of axonal disconnection and myelin degradation in AD patients. Moreover, we found a significant increase in diffusivity in specific hippocampal subregions, which is supported by neuronal loss as visualized with Klüver-Barrera staining. This work demonstrates the potential of ultra-high field diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging as a noninvasive modality to describe white and gray matter structural changes in mouse models for neurodegenerative disorders, and provides valuable knowledge to assess future AD prevention strategies in translational research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.11.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 62 · Cited by 74

Authors
Zerbi, V., Kleinnijenhuis, M., Fang, X., Jansen, D., Veltien, A., Van Asten, J., Timmer, N., Dederen, P. J., Kiliaan, A. J., & Heerschap, A.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Kiliaan, Amanda J.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
1440-1450
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015669295
Cited by
74
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • EU FP7 project LipiDiDiet (211696)
  • NWO (91106021)
  • BIG (VISTA)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, white matter degeneration, gray matter degeneration, water diffusion, myelin degradation, corpus callosum, neuronal loss, tractography, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Hippocampus, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Neurons, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review