Cited by 147Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Variants in triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 are associated with both behavioral variant frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer's disease

Open access
Giraldo, Margarita, Lopera, Francisco, Siniard, Ashley L., Corneveaux, Jason J., Schrauwen, Isabelle, Carvajal, Julian, Muñoz, Claudia, Ramirez-Restrepo, Manuel +6 more·2013·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that rare genetic variants within the TREM2 gene are associated with increased risk of Alzheimer's disease. TREM2 mutations are the genetic basis for a condition characterized by polycystic lipomembranous osteodysplasia with sclerosing leukoencephalopathy (PLOSL) and an early-onset dementia syndrome. TREM2 is important in the phagocytosis of apoptotic neuronal cells by microglia in the brain. Loss of function might lead to an impaired clearance and to accumulation of necrotic debris and subsequent neurodegeneration. In this study, we investigated a consanguineous family segregating autosomal recessive behavioral variant FTLD from Antioquia, Colombia. Exome sequencing identified a nonsense mutation in TREM2 (p.Trp198X) segregating with disease. Next, using a cohort of clinically characterized and neuropathologically verified sporadic AD cases and controls, we report replication of the AD risk association at rs75932628 within TREM2 and demonstrate that TREM2 is significantly overexpressed in the brain tissue from AD cases. These data suggest that a mutational burden in TREM2 may serve as a risk factor for neurodegenerative disease in general, and that potentially this class of TREM2 variant carriers with dementia should be considered as having a molecularly distinct form of neurodegenerative disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.02.016

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expansions in C9ORF72 have effects on microglial function as well as neurons, and risk variants for FTD in TREM2 are associated with microglial activation.

    “Expansions in C9ORF72 have effects on microglial function as well as neurons (O’Rouke et al., 2016), and risk variants for FTD in TREM2 are associated with microglial activation (Giraldo et al., 2013).”

    From Neuroinflammation and protein aggregation co-localize across the frontotemporal dementia spectrum (2020) · cites this paper as Giraldo et al., 2013

    The Results (§3.2; page not provided) identify a TREM2 mutation segregating with FTLD in a family. The Introduction (§1; page not provided) reports microglial activation in TREM2-associated PLOSL, a different condition, while the Discussion (§4; page not provided) says the mechanism linking TREM2 mutations to FTLD is unknown. The paper does not establish that the FTLD-associated mutation is associated with microglial activation. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Nonsense or missense mutations in TREM2 have been identified in several families with FTD.

    “Nonsense or missense mutations in TREM2 have been identified in several families with FTD.343–345”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 147

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. McKhann GM Albert MS Grossman M Miller B Dickson D Trojanowski JQ 2001 Clinical and pathological diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia: report of the Work Group on Frontotemporal Dementia and Pick’s Disease Arch Neurol 58 1803 1809 11708987
  2. Neary D Snowden JS Gustafson L Passant U Stuss D Black S Freedman M Kertesz A Robert PH Albert M Boone K Miller BL Cummings J Benson DF 1998 Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria Neurology 51 1546 1554 9855500

Authors
Giraldo, M., Lopera, F., Siniard, A. L., Corneveaux, J. J., Schrauwen, I., Carvajal, J., Muñoz, C., Ramirez-Restrepo, M., Gaiteri, C., Myers, A. J., Caselli, R. J., Kosik, K. S., Reiman, E. M., & Huentelman, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Antioquia (CO)
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute (US)
  • Sage Bionetworks (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Huentelman, Matthew J.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
2077.e11-2077.e18
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017321290
Cited by
147
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10
FWCI
11.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repositorio Digital - Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository University of Antioquia (University of Antioquia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Emory University (P30-AG13846)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH60451)
  • Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (111554531651)
  • Fondazione ART per la Ricerca sui Trapianti
  • Banner Alzheimer’s Foundation
  • Alzheimer's Research Trust
  • Medical Research Council
  • Mayo Clinic
  • University of Kentucky (05144)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (P50 AG16570)
  • Arizona Biomedical Research Commission (1001, 0011, 05-901, 4001)
  • National Institutes of Health (P50-AG08671)
  • Stanford University
  • Higher Education Funding Council for England
  • BRACE
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS059873, NS39764)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG034504, P30 AG19610, R01 AG031581)
  • Columbia University
  • University of Michigan
  • Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
  • Internationale Stichting Alzheimer Onderzoek
  • University of Washington (50 AG05136)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
TREM2, Alzheimer's disease, nonsense mutation, genetic risk variants, consanguineous family, microglial phagocytosis, neurodegeneration, autosomal recessive inheritance
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Behavior, Humans, Membrane Glycoproteins, Mutation, Receptors, Immunologic, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review