Cited by 55

Alzheimer's disease susceptibility variants in the MS4A6A gene are associated with altered levels of MS4A6A expression in blood

Proitsi, Petroula, Lee, Sang Hyuck, Lunnon, Katie, Keohane, Aoife, Powell, John, Troakes, Claire, Al-Sarraj, Safa, Furney, Simon +7 more·2014·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

An increased risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) has previously been found to be associated with variants at the MS4A6A locus. We sought to identify which genes and transcripts in this region have altered expression in AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and are influenced by the AD risk variant(s), as a first step to understanding the molecular basis of AD susceptibility at this locus. Common variants located within highly expressed MS4A6A transcripts were significantly associated with AD and MS4A6A expression levels in blood from MCI and AD subjects (p < 0.05, rs610932, rs7232, rs583791). More copies of the protective (minor) allele were associated with lower MS4A6A expression of each transcript (e.g., p = 0.019; rs610932-total MS4A6A). Furthermore, in heterozygous AD subjects, relative expression of the protective allele of V4-MS4A6A transcripts was lower (p < 0.008). Irrespective of genotype, MS4A6A transcripts were increased in blood from people with AD (p < 0.003), whereas lower expression of full length V1-MS4A6A (p = 0.002) and higher expression of V4-MS4A6A (p = 1.8 × 10(-4)) were observed in MCI, relative to elderly controls. The association between genotype and expression was less consistent in brain, although BA9 did have a similar genotype association with V4-MS4A6A transcripts as in blood. MS4A6A transcripts were widely expressed in tissues and cells, with the exception of V4-MS4A6A, which was not expressed in neuronal cells. Together these results su…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.08.002

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pathway analyses identified immune-related pathways that may be relevant for the mechanisms of microglial aging, including STAT-3 and IL-6 signaling, and LXR/RXR activation.

    “Our pathway analyses identified immune-related pathways that may be of relevance for the mechanisms of microglial aging, including STAT-3 and IL-6 signaling, as well as LXR/RXR activation, which has emerged as a key player in regulating cholesterol homeostasis and inflammation in the brain with a potential role in neurodegenerative disorders65–67.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Proitsi, P., Lee, S. H., Lunnon, K., Keohane, A., Powell, J., Troakes, C., Al-Sarraj, S., Furney, S., Soininen, H., Kłoszewska, I., Mecocci, P., Tsolaki, M., Vellas, B., Lovestone, S., & Hodges, A.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
279-290
ISSN
0197-4580
Cited by
55
References
5
Language
en
Funders
  • InnoMed
  • European Union of the Sixth Framework program
  • Alzheimer's Research UK
  • The John and Lucille van Geest Foundation
  • Rosetrees Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review