Cited by 52Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Discovery of gene-gene interactions across multiple independent data sets of late onset Alzheimer disease from the Alzheimer Disease Genetics Consortium

Open access
Hohman, Timothy J., Bush, William S., Jiang, Lan, Brown-Gentry, Kristin D., Torstenson, Eric S., Dudek, Scott M., Mukherjee, Shubhabrata, Naj, Adam +9 more·2016·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD) has a complex genetic etiology, involving locus heterogeneity, polygenic inheritance, and gene-gene interactions; however, the investigation of interactions in recent genome-wide association studies has been limited. We used a biological knowledge-driven approach to evaluate gene-gene interactions for consistency across 13 data sets from the Alzheimer Disease Genetics Consortium. Fifteen single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-SNP pairs within 3 gene-gene combinations were identified: SIRT1 × ABCB1, PSAP × PEBP4, and GRIN2B × ADRA1A. In addition, we extend a previously identified interaction from an endophenotype analysis between RYR3 × CACNA1C. Finally, post hoc gene expression analyses of the implicated SNPs further implicate SIRT1 and ABCB1, and implicate CDH23 which was most recently identified as an AD risk locus in an epigenetic analysis of AD. The observed interactions in this article highlight ways in which genotypic variation related to disease may depend on the genetic context in which it occurs. Further, our results highlight the utility of evaluating genetic interactions to explain additional variance in AD risk and identify novel molecular mechanisms of AD pathogenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.10.031

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hohman et al. performed the most extensive analysis of gene-gene interactions in AD to date and identified three gene-gene combinations which significantly interact to determine an individual's risk for AD.

    “Hohman et al. [268] performed the most extensive analysis of gene-gene interactions in AD to date and identified three gene-gene combinations which significantly interact to determine an individual’s risk for AD”

    From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [268]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hohman, T. J., Bush, W. S., Jiang, L., Brown-Gentry, K. D., Torstenson, E. S., Dudek, S. M., Mukherjee, S., Naj, A., Kunkle, B. W., Ritchie, M. D., Martin, E. R., Schellenberg, G. D., Mayeux, R., Farrer, L. A., Pericak-Vance, M. A., Haines, J. L., & Thornton-Wells, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
38
Pages
141-150
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129338678
Cited by
52
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1P30AG036445, 1RC2AG036528, 5R01AG027944, K12HD043483, R01LM010040)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
late-onset Alzheimer's disease, gene-gene interaction, epistasis, SIRT1, P-glycoprotein, PSAP, NR2B subunit, ADRA1A, RyR3, CACNA1C, CDH23, single nucleotide polymorphisms, polygenic inheritance, genetic susceptibility loci, Alzheimer disease pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Cadherin Related Proteins, Alzheimer Disease, Epistasis, Genetic, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Risk, Cadherins, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1, ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Disease Progression, Ryanodine Receptor Calcium Release Channel, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Calcium Channels, L-Type, Saposins, Phosphatidylethanolamine Binding Protein, Sirtuin 1, Genetic Association Studies, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review