Cited by 70Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Neuronal and behavioral effects of multi-day brain stimulation and memory training

Antonenko, Daria, Külzow, Nadine, Sousa, Angelica, Prehn, Kristin, Grittner, Ulrike, Flöel, Agnes·2018·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Strategies for memory enhancement, especially for the older population, are of great scientific and public interest. Here, we aimed at investigating neuronal and behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with memory training. Young and older adults were trained on an object-location-memory task on 3 consecutive days with either anodal or sham tDCS. Recall performance was assessed immediately after training, 1 day and 1 month later, as well as performance on trained function and transfer task. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging was conducted at baseline and at 1-day follow-up to analyze functional coupling in the default mode network. Anodal tDCS led to superior recall performance after training, an associated increase in default mode network strength and enhanced trained function and transfer after 1 month. Our findings suggest that tDCS-accompanied multi-day training improves performance on trained material, is associated with beneficial memory network alterations, and transfers to other memory tasks. Our study provides insight into tDCS-induced behavioral and neuronal alterations and will help to develop interventions against age-related cognitive decline.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.09.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 90 · Cited by 70

Authors
Antonenko, D., Külzow, N., Sousa, A., Prehn, K., Grittner, U., & Flöel, A.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Stiftung Charité (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Antonenko, Daria
  • Flöel, Agnes
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
61
Pages
245-254
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2757683506
Cited by
70
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FL 379-10, 01GQ1424A)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (FL 379-10, 01GQ1424A)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, memory training, object location memory, default mode network, functional connectivity, memory transfer, age-related cognitive decline, older adults, anodal tDCS, memory enhancement, resting-state fMRI
MeSH terms
Aged, Brain, Cognition, Female, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review