Early-life stress induces cognitive disorder in middle-aged mice
Abstract
Early-life stress can induce several neuropsychological disorders in adulthood. However, the underlying mechanisms inducing such disorders are still not fully understood. Furthermore, the effects of early-life stress on the changes in cognitive function with age are still not clarified. In this study, we used maternal deprivation (MD) to examine the cognitive function in middle-aged mice using a touchscreen-equipped operant chamber. In the visual-discrimination task, the aged (∼1.4 years old) control mice could accurately learn to discriminate between different visual stimuli. In contrast, the correct response rate of aged MD mice increased to ∼60% by day 10; it was still significantly lower than that of the control mice (85%). In the hippocampus of aged MD mice, the expression level of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunit GluN1 decreased significantly as compared to that in control mice. On the other hand, no significant difference in GluN1 expression level was detected in young (2.5 months old) mice. These findings indicate that early-life stress accelerates cognitive impairment in middle-aged mice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In animal models, long-lasting effects of early life stress have been documented.
“In animal models, long-lasting effects of ELS have been documented.202–207”
From Epigenetic regulation in major depression and other stress-related disorders: molecular mechanisms, clinical relevance and therapeutic potential (2023) · cites this paper as [207]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Yajima, H., Haijima, A., Khairinisa, M. A., Shimokawa, N., Amano, I., & Takatsuru, Y.
- Affiliations
- Gunma University (JP)
- Takasaki University of Health and Welfare (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Takatsuru, Yusuke
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Aging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 64
- Pages
- 139-146
- ISSN
- 0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2778970848
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18K03169)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- early life stress, maternal deprivation, cognitive impairment, middle-aged mice, hippocampus, GluN1, NMDA receptor, visual discrimination learning, aging, neuropsychological disorders
- MeSH terms
- Cognitive Aging, Animals, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Conditioning, Operant, Discrimination Learning, Hippocampus, Male, Maternal Deprivation, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Photic Stimulation, Stress, Psychological, Visual Perception, Gene Expression, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review