Cited by 141Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Abilities and TestingAging and Gerontology Research

Lifestyle activities in mid-life contribute to cognitive reserve in late-life, independent of education, occupation, and late-life activities

Open access
Chan, Dennis, Shafto, Meredith, Kievit, Rogier, Matthews, Fiona, Spink, Molly, Valenzuela, Michael, Henson, Rik N.·2018·Neurobiology of Aging

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that mid-life intellectual, physical, and social activities contribute to cognitive reserve (CR). Two hundred five individuals (196 with magnetic resonance imaging) aged 66-88 years from the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (www.cam-can.com) were studied, with cognitive ability and structural brain health measured as fluid IQ and total gray matter volume, respectively. Mid-life activities (MAs) were measured using the Lifetime of Experiences Questionnaire. Multivariable linear regression found that MAs made a unique contribution to late-life cognitive ability independent of education, occupation, and late-life activities. Crucially, MAs moderated the relationship between late-life cognitive ability and brain health, with the cognitive ability of people with higher MA less dependent on their brain structure, consistent with the concept of CR. In conclusion, MAs contribute uniquely to CR. The modifiability of these activities has implications for public health initiatives aimed at dementia prevention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.06.012

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 205 people aged 30-64 years followed up until 66-88 years, travel, social outings, playing music, art, physical activity, reading, and speaking a second language were associated with maintaining cognition, independent of education, occupation, late-life activities, and current structural brain health.

    “so for example, in 205 people aged 30–64 years, followed up until 66–88 years, travel, social outings, playing music, art, physical activity, reading, and speaking a second language, were associated with maintaining cognition, independent of education, occupation, late-life activities, and current structural brain health.41”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission (2020) · cites this paper as [41]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 141

Authors
Chan, D., Shafto, M., Kievit, R., Matthews, F., Spink, M., Valenzuela, M., & Henson, R. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Chan, Dennis
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
70
Pages
180-183
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2795767430
Cited by
141
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
FWCI
8.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (107392/A/15/Z)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (SUAG/010 RG91365)
  • European Commission (732592, HORIZON2020)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Medical Research Council (SUAG/010 RG91365, BB/H008217/1, U105292687, RG91365, SUAG/014 RG91365)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/H008217/1)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
cognitive reserve, intellectual activity, physical activity, social activity, gray matter volume, brain structure, dementia prevention, education, occupation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Brain, Educational Status, Employment, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Cognitive Reserve, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review