Amyloid burden and white matter hyperintensities mediate age-related cognitive differences
Open accessAbstract
This study examined the additive versus synergistic contribution of beta-amyloid (Aβ) and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) across 7 cognitive domains in 104 cognitively normal older adults. It also measured the extent to which age-related differences in cognition are driven by measurable brain pathology. All participants underwent neuropsychological assessment along with magnetic resonance imaging and Pittsburg compound B-positron emission tomography imaging for Aβ quantification. WMH severity was quantified using the age-related white matter changes scale. Stepwise regressions, moderation, and mediation modeling were performed. Our findings show that Aβ deposition single-handedly predicts poorer episodic memory performance and that Aβ and WMHs contribute additively to poorer performance in working memory and language while carrying synergistic associations with executive functions and attention. Through mediation modeling, we demonstrated that the influence of age over episodic memory, working memory, executive functions, and language is fully mediated by brain pathology. This study permits to conclude that, in healthy older adults, (1) Aβ burden and WMHs have synergistic associations with some cognitive domains and (2) age-related differences in most cognitive domains are driven by brain pathology associated with dementia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a synergistic interaction between baseline biomarkers of pathology on longitudinal cognitive functions that is dependent on frontal-subcortical circuitry in cognitive aging and pAD.
“and that there is a synergistic interaction between baseline biomarkers of pathology on longitudinal cognitive functions that is dependent on frontal–subcortical circuitry in cognitive aging and pAD [13].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 25
- Authors
- Dupont, P. S., Bocti, C., Joannette, M., Lavallée, M. M., Nikelski, J., Vallet, G. T., Chertkow, H., & Joubert, S.
- Affiliations
- Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
- Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal (CA)
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (CA)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Aging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 86
- Pages
- 16-26
- ISSN
- 0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2970618454
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- amyloid-beta, white matter hyperintensities, age-related cognitive decline, episodic memory, working memory, executive function, language, attention, neuropathology, dementia, older adults, synergistic effect
- MeSH terms
- Cognitive Aging, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Neuroimaging, White Matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review