Encoding activity in anterior medial temporal lobe supports subsequent associative recognition
Abstract
The ability to bind information together, such as linking a name with a face or a car with a parking space, is a vital process in human episodic memory. To identify the neural bases for this binding process, we measured brain activity during a verbal associative encoding task using event-related functional MRI (fMRI), followed by an associative recognition test for the studied word pairs. Analysis of the encoding data sorted by the associative recognition accuracy allowed us to isolate regions involved in successfully creating associations. We found that encoding activity in bilateral anterior medial temporal lobe (MTL) regions was greater for successfully bound pairs, that is, those later recognized as intact, than for all other pairs. These findings provide evidence that the anterior medial temporal lobes support the successful binding of information in memory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The anterior portion of the hippocampus is associated with relational processes that contribute to the ability to integrate memory details across experiences.
“In particular, the anterior portion of the hippocampus is associated with relational processes (77–79) that contribute to the ability to integrate memory details across experiences (80).”
From Neural mechanisms of reactivation-induced updating that enhance and distort memory (2013) · cites this paper as [77]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 211
- Authors
- Jackson, O., & Schacter, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jackson, Orville
- ORCID
- Schacter, Daniel L
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 456-462
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068884312
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ford Foundation
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 60941, R01MH060941)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- associative memory, binding, episodic memory, associative recognition, memory encoding, recognition memory
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Dominance, Cerebral, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Paired-Associate Learning, Temporal Lobe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review