Diffusion tensor imaging of neurodevelopment in children and young adults.
Abstract
Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DTI) was used to study regional changes in the brain's development from childhood (8-12 years, mean 11.1 +/- 1.3, N = 32) to young adulthood (21-27 years, mean 24.4 +/- 1.8, N = 28). Mean diffusivity (Trace/3 apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) were measured in 30 regions of interest (ROIs) in 13 distinct brain structures. Correlational analysis was performed to detect changes within 8-12 years and within 21-27 years, and group analysis to compare childhood diffusion properties with young adult values. Increases of fractional anisotropy were seen in the genu of the corpus callosum, splenium of the corpus callosum, corona radiata, putamen, and head of the caudate nucleus within 8-12 years, and also between childhood and young adulthood. Reductions in Trace/3 ADC were observed in 9 of 13 structures within 8-12 years and into young adulthood as well. DTI demonstrates more widespread changes in the brain's microstructure with maturation than previous reports using conventional T1-weighted MRI scans. These findings suggest a continuation of the brain's microstructural development through adolescence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Diffusion tensor imaging can measure age-related changes in white matter microstructure during childhood and adolescence.
“Age-related change in microstructure of white matter during childhood and adolescence is measurable using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) (Lebel, Walker, Leemans, Phillips, & Beaulieu, 2008;Eluvathingal, Hasan, Kramer, Fletcher, & Ewing-Cobbs, 2007;Snook, Paulson, Roy, Phillips, & Beaulieu, 2005).”
From White Matter Microstructure in Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus Associated with Spatial Working Memory Performance in Children (2011) · cites this paper as Snook et al., 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 350
- Authors
- Snook, L., Paulson, L.-A., Roy, D., Phillips, L., & Beaulieu, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Beaulieu, Christian
- ORCID
- Beaulieu, Christian
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1164-1173
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107294026
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 20.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- brain development, diffusion tensor imaging, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, apparent diffusion coefficient, corpus callosum, corona radiata, putamen, caudate nucleus, adolescence, children, young adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aging, Brain, Child, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Linear Models, Anisotropy, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review