Trauma modulates amygdala and medial prefrontal responses to consciously attended fear
Open accessAbstract
Effective fear processing relies on the amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC). Post-trauma reactions provide a compelling model for examining how the heightened experience of fear impacts these systems. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been associated with excessive amygdala and a lack of MPFC activity in response to nonconscious facial signals of fear, but responses to consciously processed facial fear stimuli have not been examined. We used functional MRI to elucidate the effect of trauma reactions on amygdala-MPFC function during an overt fear perception task. Subjects with PTSD (n = 13) and matched non-traumatized healthy subjects (n = 13) viewed 15 blocks of eight fearful face stimuli alternating pseudorandomly with 15 blocks of neutral faces (stimulus duration 500 ms; ISI 767 ms). We used random effects analyses in SPM2 to examine within- and between-group differences in the MPFC and amygdala search regions of interest. Time series data were used to examine amygdala-MPFC associations and changes across the first (Early) versus second (Late) phases of the experiment. Relative to non-traumatized subjects, PTSD subjects showed a marked bilateral reduction in MPFC activity (in particular, right anterior cingulate cortex, ACC), which showed a different Early-Late pattern to non-traumatized subjects and was more pronounced with greater trauma impact and symptomatology. PTSD subjects also showed a small but significant enhancement in left amygdala activity, most apparent during the Late phase, but reduction in Early right amygdala response. Over the time course, trauma was related to a distinct pattern of ACC and amygdala connections. The findings suggest that major life trauma may disrupt the normal pattern of medial prefrontal and amygdala regulation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Negative emotional processing has been registered among PTSD patients.
“Correspondingly, negative emotional processing has been registered among PTSD patients (Shin et al., 2004(Shin et al., , 2005;;Williams et al., 2006)”
From Neuroimaging research in posttraumatic stress disorder – Focus on amygdala, hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (2019) · cites this paper as Williams et al., 2006
Ongoing impairment of PFC functioning causes chronic reduction in descending inhibitory influences from PFC on brainstem nuclei and amygdala, which could underlie PTSD symptoms such as chronic hypervigilance, attention deficits, and impaired executive functioning.
“The ongoing impairment of PFC functioning would result in a chronic reduction in descending inhibitory influences from the PFC on brainstem nuclei and the amygdala (Williams et al. [405]), which could form the basis of certain symptoms of PTSD, such as chronic hypervigilance, attention deficits, and impaired executive functioning (Vermetten and Bremner [406]; Shin et al. [407]; Britton et al. [408”
From The Temporal Dynamics Model of Emotional Memory Processing: A Synthesis on the Neurobiological Basis of Stress-Induced Amnesia, Flashbulb and Traumatic Memories, and the Yerkes-Dodson Law (2007) · cites this paper as Williams et al. [405]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 351
- Authors
- Williams, L. M., Kemp, A. H., Felmingham, K., Barton, M., Olivieri, G., Peduto, A., Gordon, E., & Bryant, R. A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Westmead Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Williams, Leanne M.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 347-357
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990379520
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 22.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, fear perception, trauma, fear regulation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Amygdala, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Warfare, Echo-Planar Imaging, Prefrontal Cortex, Brain Hemorrhage, Traumatic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review