Cited by 363Face Recognition and PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Fate of unattended fearful faces in the amygdala is determined by both attentional resources and cognitive modulation

Open access
Pessoa, Luiz, Padmala, Srikanth, Morland, Thomas·2005·NeuroImage

Abstract

The evidence for amygdala processing of emotional items outside the focus of attention is mixed. We hypothesized that differences in attentional demands may, at least in part, explain prior discrepancies. In the present study, attention was manipulated by parametrically varying the difficulty of a central task, allowing us to compare responses evoked by unattended emotion-laden faces while the attentional load of a central task was varied. Reduced responses to unattended emotional stimuli may also reflect an active suppression of amygdala responses during difficult non-emotional tasks (cognitive modulation). To explicitly assess cognitive modulation, an experimental condition was used in which subjects performed the central task without the presence of irrelevant emotional stimuli. Our findings revealed that amygdala responses were modulated by the focus of attention. Stronger responses were evoked during a sex task (when faces were attended) relative to a bar-orientation task (when faces were unattended). Critically, a valence effect was observed in the right amygdala during low attentional demand conditions, but not during medium or high demand conditions. Moreover, performing a difficult non-emotional task alone was associated with signal decreases in a network of brain regions, including the amygdala. Such robust decreases demonstrate that cognitive modulation comprises a powerful factor in determining amygdala responses. Collectively, our findings reveal that both attentional resources and cognitive modulation govern the fate of unattended fearful faces in the amygdala.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.048

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Amygdala responses to emotion are stronger during a gender identification task (faces attended) than during a bar-orientation task (faces unattended).

    “Amygdala responses to emotion were stronger during a gender identification task (when faces were attended) than during a bar-orientation task (when faces were unattended).”

    From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Pessoa et al (2005)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 363

Authors
Pessoa, L., Padmala, S., & Morland, T.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Pessoa, Luiz
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
249-255
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111608305
Cited by
363
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 23
FWCI
8.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (RR16457)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH071589)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P20RR016457, 1P20 RR16457-03)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
amygdala, emotional face processing, fearful faces, attentional load, cognitive modulation, attentional capture, valence effects, emotional suppression, task difficulty, right amygdala
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Attention, Cognition, Cues, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Emotions, Fear, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Photic Stimulation, Sex Characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review