Cited by 63Motor Control and AdaptationNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeuroscience and Music Perception

The functional neuroanatomy of coordinated orofacial movements: sparse sampling fMRI of whistling

Dresel, Christian, Castrop, Florian, Haslinger, Bernhard, Wohlschlaeger, Afra M., Hennenlotter, Andreas, Ceballos-Baumann, Andres O.·2005·NeuroImage

Abstract

Whistling serves as a model for a skilful coordinated orofacial movement with sensorimotor integration of auditory and proprioceptive input. The neural substrate of whistling was investigated by sparse sampling functional MRI (fMRI) where the motor task occurred during a silent interval between successive image acquisitions to minimize task-related imaging artefacts. Whistling recruited a symmetrically represented neural network including primary motor and ventral premotor cortex (PMv), SMA, cingulate gyrus, basal ganglia, primary and secondary somatosensory cortex, amygdala, thalamus and cerebellum. A temporal analysis revealed higher activity of left sensory cortex, right PMv and cerebellum during late execution compared to initiation of whistling. Task-related signal changes in right PMv and right paravermal cerebellum were found to correlate with the amplitude of the whistle sound in a separate correlation analysis. The findings emphasize the role of ventral premotor cortex, cerebellum and somatosensory areas as integrators of afferent input within a distributed orofacial sensorimotor network.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Left anterior insula, bilateral premotor and sensorimotor cortices, posterior cerebellum, SMA, thalamus, and striatum are activated for producing melodies and whistling as well as speech.

    “All the above areas (left anterior insula, bilateral premotor and sensorimotor cortices, posterior cerebellum, SMA, thalamus and striatum) were activated for producing melodies (Brown et al., 2006) and whistling (Dresel et al., 2005) as well as speech.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 63

Authors
Dresel, C., Castrop, F., Haslinger, B., Wohlschlaeger, A. M., Hennenlotter, A., & Ceballos-Baumann, A. O.
Affiliations
TUM Klinikum (DE)
Corresponding author
Dresel, Christian
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
588-597
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972845487
Cited by
63
References
70
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
whistling, orofacial movements, sensorimotor integration, ventral premotor cortex, cerebellum, somatosensory cortex, basal ganglia, primary motor cortex, audiovisual integration, sensorimotor network
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brain, Cerebellum, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Face, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Lip, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Mouth, Movement, Neural Pathways, Oxygen, Reaction Time, Respiration, Somatosensory Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review