The functional neuroanatomy of coordinated orofacial movements: sparse sampling fMRI of whistling
Abstract
Whistling serves as a model for a skilful coordinated orofacial movement with sensorimotor integration of auditory and proprioceptive input. The neural substrate of whistling was investigated by sparse sampling functional MRI (fMRI) where the motor task occurred during a silent interval between successive image acquisitions to minimize task-related imaging artefacts. Whistling recruited a symmetrically represented neural network including primary motor and ventral premotor cortex (PMv), SMA, cingulate gyrus, basal ganglia, primary and secondary somatosensory cortex, amygdala, thalamus and cerebellum. A temporal analysis revealed higher activity of left sensory cortex, right PMv and cerebellum during late execution compared to initiation of whistling. Task-related signal changes in right PMv and right paravermal cerebellum were found to correlate with the amplitude of the whistle sound in a separate correlation analysis. The findings emphasize the role of ventral premotor cortex, cerebellum and somatosensory areas as integrators of afferent input within a distributed orofacial sensorimotor network.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Left anterior insula, bilateral premotor and sensorimotor cortices, posterior cerebellum, SMA, thalamus, and striatum are activated for producing melodies and whistling as well as speech.
“All the above areas (left anterior insula, bilateral premotor and sensorimotor cortices, posterior cerebellum, SMA, thalamus and striatum) were activated for producing melodies (Brown et al., 2006) and whistling (Dresel et al., 2005) as well as speech.”
From A review and synthesis of the first 20years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading (2012) · cites this paper as Dresel et al., 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Dresel, C., Castrop, F., Haslinger, B., Wohlschlaeger, A. M., Hennenlotter, A., & Ceballos-Baumann, A. O.
- Affiliations
- TUM Klinikum (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Dresel, Christian
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 588-597
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972845487
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Keywords
- whistling, orofacial movements, sensorimotor integration, ventral premotor cortex, cerebellum, somatosensory cortex, basal ganglia, primary motor cortex, audiovisual integration, sensorimotor network
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Brain, Cerebellum, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Face, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Lip, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Mouth, Movement, Neural Pathways, Oxygen, Reaction Time, Respiration, Somatosensory Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review