Cited by 219Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Evidence for developmental changes in the visual word processing network beyond adolescence

Brem, Silvia, Bucher, Kerstin, Halder, Pascal, Summers, Paul, Dietrich, Thomas, Martin, Ernst, Brandeis, Daniel·2006·NeuroImage

Abstract

Late development of specialization in the visual word processing system was examined using event-related potentials (ERP) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of word and symbol string processing in groups of adolescents (15.2-17.3 years) and adults (19.8-30.8 years). We focused our ERP analyses on fast visual activity: the occipital P1 (82-131 ms) modulated by physical stimulus characteristics and the occipito-temporal N1 (132-256 ms) reflecting visual tuning for print. Our fMRI analyses concentrated on basal occipito-temporal activations in the visual word form area VWFA. For words, the correlation of fMRI activation in the VWFA and N1 amplitude confirmed the close relationship of the electrophysiological N1 with metabolic activity in the VWFA. Further support for this relationship came from low resolution electromagnetic tomography localizing the word-specific N1 near the VWFA. Both imaging techniques revealed age-independent differences between words and symbol strings. Late development, however, was preferentially detected with ERPs. Decreases of P1 and N1 amplitudes with age were not limited to words and suggested further maturation of the underlying brain microstructure and function. Following adolescence, decreasing N1 latencies specific to words point to continued specialization of the visual word processing system. Both N1 and fMRI measures correlated with reading performance. In summary, the similarity of global fMRI activation patterns between groups suggests a fully established distribution of the reading network in adolescence, while the decreasing N1 latencies for words indicate protracted fine tuning after adolescence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variability in fMRI findings around the occipito-temporal sulcus is unlikely to be caused by differences between orthographic systems.

    “Differences between orthographic systems are unlikely to be the reason for this variability in fMRI results, because there are both negative and positive results in both German (compare Brem et al., 2006 with Kronbichler et al., 2006) and English (compare Church et al., 2008 with Turkeltaub et al., 2003).”

    From The Development of Cortical Sensitivity to Visual Word Forms (2011) · cites this paper as Brem et al., 2006

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 95 · Cited by 219

Authors
Brem, S., Bucher, K., Halder, P., Summers, P., Dietrich, T., Martin, E., & Brandeis, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • University Children's Hospital Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Brandeis, Daniel
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
822-837
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028136459
Cited by
219
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
14.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
visual word processing, reading network, visual word form area, N1 component, P1 component, occipitotemporal cortex, brain maturation, adolescence, adult reading, reading achievement, LORETA
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Electroencephalography, Electrophysiology, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mental Processes, Nerve Net, Occipital Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reading, Temporal Lobe, Artifacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review