Cited by 172Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMotor Control and Adaptation

Different neural systems adjust motor behavior in response to reward and punishment

Wrase, Jana, Kahnt, Thorsten, Schlagenhauf, Florian, Beck, Anne, Cohen, Michael X., Knutson, Brian, Heinz, Andreas·2007·NeuroImage

Abstract

Individuals use the outcomes of their actions to adjust future behavior. However, it remains unclear whether the same neural circuits are used to adjust behavior due to rewarding and punishing outcomes. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and a reward-providing reaction time task to investigate the adaptation of a simple motor response following four different outcomes (delivery versus omission and monetary gain versus loss). We found that activation in the thalamus and insula predicted adjustments of motor responses due to outcomes that were cued and delivered, whereas activation in the ventral striatum predicted such adjustments when outcomes were cued but omitted. Further, activation of OFC predicted improvement after all punishing outcomes, independent of whether they were omitted rewards or delivered punishments. Finally, we found that activity in anterior cingulate predicted adjustment after delivered punishments and activity in dorsal striatum predicted adaptation after delivered rewards. Our results provide evidence that different but somewhat overlapping circuits mediate the same behavioral adaptation when it is driven by different incentive outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The neuroimaging literature is profoundly inconsistent on the role of the striatum in aversive learning, with some studies reporting increased VS activity in aversive contexts and others reporting decreased activity.

    “the neuroimaging literature is profoundly inconsistent on this point, with some studies reporting increased VS activity in aversive contexts (Figure 2c) [62–64] and others reporting decreasing activity in this area during the prediction, learning, and receipt of aversive outcomes [65,66].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 172

Authors
Wrase, J., Kahnt, T., Schlagenhauf, F., Beck, A., Cohen, M. X., Knutson, B., & Heinz, A.
Affiliations
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Heinz, Andreas
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
1253-1262
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083105609
Cited by
172
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
reward, punishment, thalamus, insula, ventral striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, dorsal striatum, monetary gains and losses
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Corpus Striatum, Dominance, Cerebral, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Nerve Net, Occipital Lobe, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Punishment, Reaction Time, Reward, Statistics as Topic, Temporal Lobe, Thalamus, Feedback, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review