Influence of attentional demands on the processing of emotional facial expressions in the amygdala
Abstract
Recent studies have cast doubts on the appealing idea that the processing of threat-related stimuli in the amygdala is unconstrained by the availability of attentional resources. However, these studies exclusively used face stimuli presented at fixation and it is unclear whether their conclusion can apply to peripheral face stimuli. Thus, we designed an experiment in which we manipulated the perceptual attentional load of the task used to divert attention from peripheral face stimuli: participants were presented simultaneously with four peripheral pictures (two faces, either both neutral or both fearful, and two houses) that were slightly tilted, and had to match two of these pictures (defined by their position on the screen) either for orientation of the tilt or for identity. The identity task was confirmed to involve greater attentional load than the orientation task by differences in accuracy, reaction times, subsequent face recognition performance, and patterns of activation in several cortical regions. In the orientation task, ignored fearful faces led to stronger activation in the right amygdala than ignored neutral faces. However, this differential response was abolished when participants performed the difficult identity-matching task. Thus, emotional processing of peripheral faces in the amygdala also appears to depend on the available perceptual attentional resources.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Emotional processing of unattended peripheral faces in the amygdala depends on attentional demands of the main task; more demanding task, less amygdala response.
“Silvert et al (2007) showed that emotional processing of unattended peripheral faces in the amygdala depended on the attentional demands on the main task; the more demanding the task, the less the amygdala response.”
From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Silvert et al (2007)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 104
- Authors
- Silvert, L., Lepsien, J., Fragopanagos, N., Goolsby, B., Kiss, M., Taylor, J. G., Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., Eimer, M., & Nobre, A. C.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- University of London (GB)
- Bangor University (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-11-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 357-366
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111769514
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/B/16186)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- amygdala, emotional facial expressions, attentional load, attentional capture, fearful faces, threat processing, face recognition (cognition), perceptual attention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Amygdala, Attention, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Facial Expression, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Photic Stimulation, Recognition, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review