Cited by 225Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

A simple view of the brain through a frequency-specific functional connectivity measure

Salvador, R., Martínez, A., Pomarol-Clotet, E., Gomar, J., Vila, F., Sarró, S., Capdevila, A., Bullmore, E.·2008·NeuroImage

Abstract

Here we develop a measure of functional connectivity describing the degree of covariability between a brain region and the rest of the brain. This measure is based on previous formulas for the mutual information (MI) between clusters of regions in the frequency domain. Under the current scenario, the MI can be given as a simple monotonous function of the multiple coherence and it leads to an easy visual representation of connectivity patterns. Computationally efficient formulas, adequate for short time series, are presented and applied to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data measured in subjects (N=34) performing a working memory task or being at rest. While resting state coherence in high (0.17-0.25 Hz) and middle (0.08-0.17 Hz) frequency intervals is bilaterally salient in several limbic and temporal areas including the insula, the amygdala, and the primary auditory cortex, low frequencies (<0.08 Hz) have greatest connectivity in frontal structures. Results from the comparison between resting and N-back conditions show enhanced low frequency coherence in many of the areas previously reported in standard fMRI activation studies of working memory, but task related reductions in high frequency connectivity are also found in regions of the default mode network. Finally, potentially confounding effects of head movement and regional volume on MI are identified and addressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 225

Authors
Salvador, R., Martínez, A., Pomarol-Clotet, E., Gomar, J., Vila, F., Sarró, S., Capdevila, A., & Bullmore, E.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Salvador, R.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
279-289
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062229853
Cited by
225
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
functional connectivity, mutual information, multiple coherence, frequency-specific connectivity, resting state, working memory, default mode network, n-back task, limbic system, insula, amygdala, auditory cortex, frontal cortex
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Male, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Mental Recall, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review