Cited by 61Prenatal Substance Exposure EffectsFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersBirth, Development, and Health

Corpus callosum in adolescent offspring exposed prenatally to maternal cigarette smoking

Paus, T., Nawazkhan, I., Leonard, G., Perron, M., Pike, G.B., Pitiot, A., Richer, L., Veillette, S. +1 more·2008·NeuroImage

Abstract

Teratogens, such as alcohol or anti-epileptic drugs, affect the size of the corpus callosum. Here we report findings obtained in a case-control study that investigated possible effects of teratogens contained in cigarette smoke on the size and structural properties of this structure. We recruited and scanned with magnetic resonance imaging a total of 408 adolescents (12 to 18 years of age); a subsample of 300 adolescents is considered in this report. Cases (n=146) were exposed to maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy; non-exposed controls (n=154) were matched to cases by maternal education. We measured the size of corpus callosum (CC) and its sections (corrected for brain size), as well as mean values of magnetization-transfer ratio (MTR) in each CC section. Corpus callosum, and especially its posterior part, was smaller in the exposed vs. non-exposed female adolescents; no significant effects were found in males. Exposed and non-exposed subjects did not differ in the MTR-based index of myelination in either gender in any CC section. Given the lack of exposure effect on the myelination index, this finding might reflect a lower number of inter-hemispheric connections in female offspring of mothers who smoked during pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.066

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 61

Authors
Paus, T., Nawazkhan, I., Leonard, G., Perron, M., Pike, G. B., Pitiot, A., Richer, L., Veillette, S., & Pausova, Z.
Affiliations
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Cégep de Jonquière (CA)
  • Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (CA)
Corresponding author
Paus, T.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
435-441
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988119388
Cited by
61
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Heart And Stroke Foundation Of Quebec
  • Canada Foundation for Innovation
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
corpus callosum, smoking during pregnancy, teratogens, adolescent offspring, sex differences, myelination, magnetization transfer ratio, corpus callosum size, brain structure
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Corpus Callosum, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Organ Size, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Smoking, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review