Cited by 536Action Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Gender differences in brain networks supporting empathy

Schulte-Rüther, Martin, Markowitsch, Hans J., Shah, N. Jon, Fink, Gereon R., Piefke, Martina·2008·NeuroImage

Abstract

Females frequently score higher on standard tests of empathy, social sensitivity, and emotion recognition than do males. It remains to be clarified, however, whether these gender differences are associated with gender specific neural mechanisms of emotional social cognition. We investigated gender differences in an emotion attribution task using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Subjects either focused on their own emotional response to emotion expressing faces (SELF-task) or evaluated the emotional state expressed by the faces (OTHER-task). Behaviorally, females rated SELF-related emotions significantly stronger than males. Across the sexes, SELF- and OTHER-related processing of facial expressions activated a network of medial and lateral prefrontal, temporal, and parietal brain regions involved in emotional perspective taking. During SELF-related processing, females recruited the right inferior frontal cortex and superior temporal sulcus stronger than males. In contrast, there was increased neural activity in the left temporoparietal junction in males (relative to females). When performing the OTHER-task, females showed increased activation of the right inferior frontal cortex while there were no differential activations in males. The data suggest that females recruit areas containing mirror neurons to a higher degree than males during both SELF- and OTHER-related processing in empathic face-to-face interactions. This may underlie facilitated emotional "contagion" in females. Together with the observation that males differentially rely on the left temporoparietal junction (an area mediating the distinction between the SELF and OTHERS) the data suggest that females and males rely on different strategies when assessing their own emotions in response to other people.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.180

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms.

    “males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms”

    From Anterior insular cortex and emotional awareness (2013) · cites this paper as Schulte-Ruther et al., 2008

  • Socially transmitted fear was seen to a greater extent in females than in males.

    “Similar to reports of emotional state-matching in humans12,43, socially transmitted fear was seen to a greater extent in females than in males and was bolstered by administration of the neuropeptide oxytocin.”

    From Oxytocin enhances observational fear in mice (2017) · cites this paper as [43]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 536

Authors
Schulte-Rüther, M., Markowitsch, H. J., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., & Piefke, M.
Affiliations
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
393-403
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152581830
Cited by
536
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 32
FWCI
27.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (submittedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
gender differences, empathy, emotion attribution, facial expression recognition, self-other distinction, temporoparietal junction, inferior frontal cortex, superior temporal sulcus, mirror neurons, emotional contagion, perspective taking, brain networks
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Empathy, Female, Humans, Male, Nerve Net, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review