Gender differences in brain networks supporting empathy
Abstract
Females frequently score higher on standard tests of empathy, social sensitivity, and emotion recognition than do males. It remains to be clarified, however, whether these gender differences are associated with gender specific neural mechanisms of emotional social cognition. We investigated gender differences in an emotion attribution task using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Subjects either focused on their own emotional response to emotion expressing faces (SELF-task) or evaluated the emotional state expressed by the faces (OTHER-task). Behaviorally, females rated SELF-related emotions significantly stronger than males. Across the sexes, SELF- and OTHER-related processing of facial expressions activated a network of medial and lateral prefrontal, temporal, and parietal brain regions involved in emotional perspective taking. During SELF-related processing, females recruited the right inferior frontal cortex and superior temporal sulcus stronger than males. In contrast, there was increased neural activity in the left temporoparietal junction in males (relative to females). When performing the OTHER-task, females showed increased activation of the right inferior frontal cortex while there were no differential activations in males. The data suggest that females recruit areas containing mirror neurons to a higher degree than males during both SELF- and OTHER-related processing in empathic face-to-face interactions. This may underlie facilitated emotional "contagion" in females. Together with the observation that males differentially rely on the left temporoparietal junction (an area mediating the distinction between the SELF and OTHERS) the data suggest that females and males rely on different strategies when assessing their own emotions in response to other people.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms.
“males and females have been shown to use different strategies in emotion paradigms”
From Anterior insular cortex and emotional awareness (2013) · cites this paper as Schulte-Ruther et al., 2008
Socially transmitted fear was seen to a greater extent in females than in males.
“Similar to reports of emotional state-matching in humans12,43, socially transmitted fear was seen to a greater extent in females than in males and was bolstered by administration of the neuropeptide oxytocin.”
From Oxytocin enhances observational fear in mice (2017) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 76 · Cited by 536
- Authors
- Schulte-Rüther, M., Markowitsch, H. J., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., & Piefke, M.
- Affiliations
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 393-403
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152581830
- Semantic Scholar
- adb8cf4018456d168e0f2317908a7f70934a5ea8
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 27.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (submittedVersion)
- PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
- Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- gender differences, empathy, emotion attribution, facial expression recognition, self-other distinction, temporoparietal junction, inferior frontal cortex, superior temporal sulcus, mirror neurons, emotional contagion, perspective taking, brain networks
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Empathy, Female, Humans, Male, Nerve Net, Sex Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review