Age-related changes in modular organization of human brain functional networks
Abstract
Graph theory allows us to quantify any complex system, e.g., in social sciences, biology or technology, that can be abstractly described as a set of nodes and links. Here we derived human brain functional networks from fMRI measurements of endogenous, low frequency, correlated oscillations in 90 cortical and subcortical regions for two groups of healthy (young and older) participants. We investigated the modular structure of these networks and tested the hypothesis that normal brain aging might be associated with changes in modularity of sparse networks. Newman's modularity metric was maximised and topological roles were assigned to brain regions depending on their specific contributions to intra- and inter-modular connectivity. Both young and older brain networks demonstrated significantly non-random modularity. The young brain network was decomposed into 3 major modules: central and posterior modules, which comprised mainly nodes with few inter-modular connections, and a dorsal fronto-cingulo-parietal module, which comprised mainly nodes with extensive inter-modular connections. The mean network in the older group also included posterior, superior central and dorsal fronto-striato-thalamic modules but the number of intermodular connections to frontal modular regions was significantly reduced, whereas the number of connector nodes in posterior and central modules was increased.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The segregation of network modules observed in this data is much more pronounced than that observed in resting-state functional connectivity matrices.
“The segregation of network modules observed in this data is much more pronounced than that observed in resting-state functional connectivity matrices (23, 36, 37).”
From Dynamic reconfiguration of frontal brain networks during executive cognition in humans (2015) · cites this paper as [37]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 756
- Authors
- Meunier, D., Achard, S., Morcom, A., & Bullmore, E.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 715-723
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164262344
- Cited by
- 756
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 57
- FWCI
- 15.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- functional brain networks, brain aging, network modularity, modular organization, graph theory
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Brain, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Models, Statistical, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review