Cited by 756Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesComplex Network Analysis TechniquesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Age-related changes in modular organization of human brain functional networks

Meunier, David, Achard, Sophie, Morcom, Alexa, Bullmore, Ed·2009·NeuroImage

Abstract

Graph theory allows us to quantify any complex system, e.g., in social sciences, biology or technology, that can be abstractly described as a set of nodes and links. Here we derived human brain functional networks from fMRI measurements of endogenous, low frequency, correlated oscillations in 90 cortical and subcortical regions for two groups of healthy (young and older) participants. We investigated the modular structure of these networks and tested the hypothesis that normal brain aging might be associated with changes in modularity of sparse networks. Newman's modularity metric was maximised and topological roles were assigned to brain regions depending on their specific contributions to intra- and inter-modular connectivity. Both young and older brain networks demonstrated significantly non-random modularity. The young brain network was decomposed into 3 major modules: central and posterior modules, which comprised mainly nodes with few inter-modular connections, and a dorsal fronto-cingulo-parietal module, which comprised mainly nodes with extensive inter-modular connections. The mean network in the older group also included posterior, superior central and dorsal fronto-striato-thalamic modules but the number of intermodular connections to frontal modular regions was significantly reduced, whereas the number of connector nodes in posterior and central modules was increased.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.062

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The segregation of network modules observed in this data is much more pronounced than that observed in resting-state functional connectivity matrices.

    “The segregation of network modules observed in this data is much more pronounced than that observed in resting-state functional connectivity matrices (23, 36, 37).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 756

Authors
Meunier, D., Achard, S., Morcom, A., & Bullmore, E.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
715-723
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164262344
Cited by
756
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 57
FWCI
15.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
functional brain networks, brain aging, network modularity, modular organization, graph theory
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Brain, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Models, Statistical, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review