Cited by 59Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismAction Observation and SynchronizationPhonetics and Phonology Research

Auditory-motor integration during fast repetition: the neuronal correlates of shadowing

Peschke, C., Ziegler, W., Kappes, J., Baumgaertner, A.·2009·NeuroImage

Abstract

This fMRI study examined which structures of a proposed dorsal stream system are involved in the auditory-motor integration during fast overt repetition. We used a shadowing task which requires immediate repetition of an auditory-verbal input and is supposed to elicit unconscious imitation effects of phonologically irrelevant speech parameters. Subjects' responses were recorded in the scanner. To examine automated auditory-motor mapping of speech gestures of others onto one's own speech production system we contrasted the shadowing of pseudowords produced by multiple speakers (men, women, and children) with the shadowing of pseudowords produced by a single speaker. Furthermore, we asked whether behavioral variables predicted changes in functional activation during shadowing. Shadowing multiple speakers compared to a single speaker elicited increased bilateral activation predominantly in the superior temporal sulci. These regions may mediate acoustic-phonetic speaker normalization in preparation of a translation of perceptual into motor information. Additional activation in Broca's area and the thalamus may reflect motor effects of the adaptation to multiple speaker models. Item-wise correlational analyses of response latencies with BOLD signal changes indicated that longer latencies were associated with increased activation in the left parietal operculum, suggesting that this area plays a central role in the actual transfer of auditory-verbal information to speech motor representations. A multiple regression of behavioral with imaging data showed activation in a right inferior parietal area near the temporo-parietal boundary which correlated positively with the degree of speech rate imitation and negatively with response latency. This activation may be attributable to attentional and/or paralinguistic processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.061

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 87 · Cited by 59

Authors
Peschke, C., Ziegler, W., Kappes, J., & Baumgaertner, A.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • München Klinik Bogenhausen (DE)
Corresponding author
Baumgaertner, A.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
392-402
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113906301
Cited by
59
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF-01GW0572)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
auditory-motor integration, shadowing, speech repetition, dorsal stream, superior temporal sulcus, speaker normalization, Broca's area, thalamus, parietal operculum, inferior parietal cortex, pseudowords, response latency
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Activity, Regression Analysis, Speech, Speech Perception, Task Performance and Analysis, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review