Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-contrast large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping for diffusion tensor imaging

Open access
Ceritoglu, Can, Oishi, Kenichi, Li, Xin, Chou, Ming-Chung, Younes, Laurent, Albert, Marilyn, Lyketsos, Constantine, van Zijl, Peter C.M., Miller, Michael I., Mori, Susumu·2009·NeuroImage

Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can reveal detailed white matter anatomy and has the potential to detect abnormalities in specific white matter structures. Such detection and quantification are, however, not straightforward. The voxel-based analysis after image normalization is one of the most widely used methods for quantitative image analyses. To apply this approach to DTI, it is important to examine if structures in the white matter are well registered among subjects, which would be highly dependent on employed algorithms for normalization. In this paper, we evaluate the accuracy of normalization of DTI data using a highly elastic transformation algorithm, called large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping. After simulation-based validation of the algorithm, DTI data from normal subjects were used to measure the registration accuracy. To examine the impact of morphological abnormalities on the accuracy, the algorithm was also tested using data from Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients with severe brain atrophy. The accuracy level was measured by using manual landmark-based white matter matching and surface-based brain and ventricle matching as gold standard. To improve the accuracy level, cascading and multi-contrast approaches were developed. The accuracy level for the white matter was 1.88 ± 0.55 and 2.19 ± 0.84 mm for the measured locations in the controls and patients, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.057

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Ceritoglu, C., Oishi, K., Li, X., Chou, M.-C., Younes, L., Albert, M., Lyketsos, C., van Zijl, P. C. M., Miller, M. I., & Mori, S.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
618-627
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092811935
Cited by
196
References
4
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-contrast large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping for diffusion tensor imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.057
The paper
Ceritoglu, C., Oishi, K., Li, X., Chou, M.-C., Younes, L., Albert, M., Lyketsos, C., van Zijl, P. C. M., Miller, M. I., & Mori, S. (2009). Multi-contrast large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping for diffusion tensor imaging. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.057

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.