Neural correlates of social cognition in naturalistic settings: a model-free analysis approach
Abstract
Neuroimaging studies have consistently identified a network of brain regions subserving inferences of other humans' mental states. This network consists of the superior temporal sulcus, temporoparietal junction, medial prefrontal cortex, temporal poles, and precuneus. Little is known, however, about the neural substrate underlying Theory of Mind processes in close to real-life conditions. To investigate those processes in more naturalistic settings, we used an fMRI adaptation of the video-based Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC; Dziobek et al., 2006), which considers separate analysis of implicit mental state reasoning during rapidly changing perceptual cues as demanded in naturalistic settings and explicit mental state reasoning. We analyzed fMRI data by means of both a standard general linear model (GLM) approach and a tensor probabilistic independent component analysis (T-PICA), which is a novel model-free approach that allows decomposition of activation into independent spatio-temporally coherent functional networks. The model-based GLM approach revealed the typical explicit mental state reasoning network. Complementary to the GLM approach, the model-free T-PICA approach showed that those regions are also recruited during implicit mental state reasoning and that they are represented in three independent, functionally connected networks. The first component, mediating face processing and recognition, comprises the occipito-parietotemporal cortices, while the second component, involved in language comprehension, comprises the temporal lobes, lateral prefrontal cortex, and precuneus. The dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and the precuneus comprise the third component, which is likely responsible for self-referential mental activity. These results show that the mental state reasoning network can be decomposed into circumscribed functional networks mediating differential aspects of Theory of Mind.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The PCC plays a role in understanding other people's minds.
“This suggestion is supported by studies pointing to a role of the PCC in understanding other people's minds (e.g.Wolf et al., 2010).”
From Oxytocin effects on complex brain networks are moderated by experiences of maternal love withdrawal (2013) · cites this paper as Wolf et al., 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 137
- Authors
- Wolf, I., Dziobek, I., & Heekeren, H. R.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Heekeren, Hauke R.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 894-904
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964101973
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 12.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- theory of mind, social cognition, mental state reasoning, naturalistic settings, model-independent analysis, functional brain networks, face processing, language comprehension, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, precuneus, temporoparietal junction, superior temporal sulcus
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cognition, Cues, Environment, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Social Perception, Principal Component Analysis, Young Adult, Theory of Mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review