Effects of age and sex on developmental neural networks of visual–spatial attention allocation
Abstract
Compared to our understanding of the functional maturation of brain networks underlying complex cognitive abilities, hardly anything is known of the neurofunctional development of simpler cognitive abilities such as visuo-spatial attention allocation. Furthermore, nothing is known on the effect of gender on the functional development of attention allocation. This study employed event related functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate effects of age, sex, and sex by age interactions on the brain activation of 63 males and females, between 13 to 38years, during a visual-spatial oddball task. Behaviourally, with increasing age, speed was traded for accuracy, indicative of a less impulsive performance style in older subjects. Increasing age was associated with progressively increased activation in typical areas of selective attention of lateral fronto-striatal and temporo-parietal brain regions. Sex difference analysis showed enhanced activation in right-hemispheric inferior frontal and superior temporal regions in females, and in left-hemispheric inferior temporo-parietal regions in males. Importantly, the age by sex interaction findings showed that these sex-dimorphic patterns of brain activation may be the result of underlying sex differences in the functional maturation of these brain regions, as females had sex-specific progressive age-correlations in the same right inferior fronto-striato-temporal areas, while male-specific age-correlations were in left medial temporal and parietal areas. The findings demonstrate progressive functional maturation of fronto-striato-parieto-temporal networks of the relatively simple function of attention allocation between early adolescence and mid-adulthood. They furthermore show that sex-dimorphic patterns of enhanced reliance on right inferior frontal, striatal and superior temporal regions in females and of left temporo-parietal regions in males during attention allocation may be the result of underlying sex differences in the functional maturation of these brain regions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Female individuals experience greater interference than male individuals in multiple inhibitory control tasks.
“Female individuals experience greater interference than male individuals in multiple inhibitory control tasks.”
From Functional Specificity and Sex Differences in the Neural Circuits Supporting the Inhibition of Automatic Imitation (2018) · cites this paper as Rubia et al. (2010)
The control module relies on prefrontal cortical structures with specialized functions: inhibition in right inferior prefrontal cortex, working memory and cognitive salience detection in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and conflict detection/monitoring/resolution in anterior cingulate cortex.
“This module relies on prefrontal cortical structures that carry specialized functions, such as inhibition (right inferior prefrontal cortex) (Aron et al., 2004; Chikazoe et al., 2007; Liddle et al., 2001), working memory and cognitive salience detection (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) (Rubia et al., 2010), and conflict detection, monitoring, and resolution (anterior cingulate cortex) (Amodio and”
From A systematic review of fMRI reward paradigms used in studies of adolescents vs. adults: The impact of task design and implications for understanding neurodevelopment (2013) · cites this paper as Rubia et al., 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 110 · Cited by 148
- Authors
- Rubia, K., Hyde, Z., Halari, R., Giampietro, V., & Smith, A.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Rubia, Katya
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 817-827
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157901815
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 110
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (053272/Z/98/Z/JRS/JP/JAT)
- Medical Research Council (GO300155)
- PPP Healthcare (1206/1140)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- sex differences, age differences, functional maturation, neural development, oddball paradigm, right inferior frontal cortex, temporoparietal cortex, hemispheric lateralization, adolescence, impulsivity, speed-accuracy trade-off
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aging, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Sex Characteristics, Sex Factors, Space Perception, Visual Perception, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review