Cited by 209Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Age-related regional variations of the corpus callosum identified by diffusion tensor tractography

Lebel, Catherine, Caverhill-Godkewitsch, Saul, Beaulieu, Christian·2010·NeuroImage

Abstract

The corpus callosum is the largest white matter connection in the human brain, and an understanding of its evolution with age in healthy individuals is one crucial aspect for determining its role in cognition and disease. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) allows for investigation of age-related callosal changes since tractography can both virtually reconstruct the segments of the corpus callosum in vivo based on unique target cortical regions, and provide quantitative diffusion parameters reflecting tissue microstructure. DTI tractography was used to subdivide the corpus callosum into seven distinct sections based on unique target areas (i.e., orbital frontal, anterior frontal, superior frontal, superior parietal, posterior parietal, temporal, and occipital) in a very large number of healthy volunteers (n=315) across a wide age range (5-59 years). Both fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) changes with respect to age were fit with Poisson curves, showing increasing FA and decreasing MD during childhood and adolescence and slightly slower decreases of FA and increases of MD at older ages. Age at peak FA values and minimum MD values varied from 21 to 44 years, and an overall "outer-to-inner" trend was observed in which the anterior and posterior regions peaked earlier than central areas. In addition to these maturational trends of diffusion parameters reflecting the microstructural changes in the healthy corpus callosum over a large age range spanning childhood to o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.072

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 57 · Cited by 209

Authors
Lebel, C., Caverhill-Godkewitsch, S., & Beaulieu, C.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Beaulieu, Christian
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
20-31
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170975082
Cited by
209
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
13.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
corpus callosum, age-related changes, white matter maturation, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, regional variation, diffusion tensor tractography, healthy adults, childhood and adolescence, brain development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Child, Child, Preschool, Corpus Callosum, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Organ Size, Sex Characteristics, Poisson Distribution, Anisotropy, Young Adult, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review