Cited by 204Face Recognition and PerceptionAction Observation and SynchronizationEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Similarities and differences in perceiving threat from dynamic faces and bodies. An fMRI study

Open access
Kret, M.E., Pichon, S., Grèzes, J., de Gelder, B.·2011·NeuroImage

Abstract

Neuroscientific research on the perception of emotional signals has mainly focused on how the brain processes threat signals from photographs of facial expressions. Much less is known about body postures or about the processing of dynamic images. We undertook a systematic comparison of the neurofunctional network dedicated to processing facial and bodily expressions. Two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments investigated whether areas involved in processing social signals are activated differently by threatening signals (fear and anger) from facial or bodily expressions. The amygdala (AMG) was more active for facial than for bodily expressions. Body stimuli triggered higher activation than face stimuli in a number of areas. These were the cuneus, fusiform gyrus (FG), extrastriate body area (EBA), temporoparietal junction (TPJ), superior parietal lobule (SPL), primary somatosensory cortex (SI), as well as the thalamus. Emotion-specific effects were found in TPJ and FG for bodies and faces alike. EBA and superior temporal sulcus (STS) were more activated by threatening bodies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.012

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Girls may use the cuneus and lingual gyrus, which are involved in emotional face processing, for socio-emotional processing as a distinct mechanism supporting connectivity patterns that manifest as sexually dimorphic social behavior.

    “Alternatively, girls may rely on regions such as the cuneus and LG, which are implicated in emotional face processing (Bremner et al., 2004, Kitada et al., 2010, Kret et al., 2011), for socio-emotional processing as a distinct mechanism supporting neural functional connectivity patterns that in turn manifest into sexually dimorphic social behavior.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 204

Authors
Kret, M. E., Pichon, S., Grèzes, J., & de Gelder, B.
Affiliations
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Inserm (FR)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
1755-1762
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968358788
Cited by
204
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO, 400.04081)
  • Human Frontiers Science Program (RGP54/2004)
  • European Commission (COBOL FP6-NEST-043403)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
threat perception, facial expressions, posture, dynamic stimuli, amygdala, extrastriate body area, temporoparietal junction, fusiform gyrus, superior parietal lobule, primary somatosensory cortex, thalamus, fear, anger, social signal processing, emotional face processing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Posture, Visual Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review