Effective connectivity analysis demonstrates involvement of premotor cortex during speech perception
Abstract
Several reports of premotor cortex involvement in speech perception have been put forward. Still, the functional role of premotor cortex is under debate. In order to investigate the functional role of premotor cortex, we presented parametrically varied speech stimuli in both a behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study. White noise was transformed over seven distinct steps into a speech sound and presented to the participants in a randomized order. As control condition served the same transformation from white noise into a music instrument sound. The fMRI data were modelled with Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) where the effective connectivity between Heschl's gyrus, planum temporale, superior temporal sulcus and premotor cortex were tested. The fMRI results revealed a graded increase in activation in the left superior temporal sulcus. Premotor cortex activity was only present at an intermediate step when the speech sounds became identifiable but were still distorted but was not present when the speech sounds were clearly perceivable. A Bayesian model selection procedure favored a model that contained significant interconnections between Heschl's gyrus, planum temporal, and superior temporal sulcus when processing speech sounds. In addition, bidirectional connections between premotor cortex and superior temporal sulcus and from planum temporale to premotor cortex were significant. Processing non-speech sounds initiated no significant connections to premotor cortex. Since the highest level of motor activity was observed only when processing identifiable sounds with incomplete phonological information, it is concluded that premotor cortex is not generally necessary for speech perception but may facilitate interpreting a sound as speech when the acoustic input is sparse.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Activation in the left premotor cortex during speech processing is associated with better perceptual performance, particularly when the acoustic input is sparse.
“Activation in the left premotor cortex during speech processing was associated with better perceptual performance (Callan et al., 2010), particularly when the acoustic input was sparse (Osnes et al., 2011).”
From A review and synthesis of the first 20years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading (2012) · cites this paper as Osnes et al., 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 112
- Authors
- Osnes, B., Hugdahl, K., & Specht, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Osnes, Berge
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2437-2445
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982286100
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Haukeland Universitetssjukehus
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- premotor cortex, speech perception, effective connectivity, dynamic causal modeling, superior temporal sulcus, planum temporale, Heschl's gyrus, auditory cortex, phonological information, auditory-motor interaction
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Bayes Theorem, Brain Mapping, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Motor Cortex, Music, Neural Pathways, Noise, Speech Perception, Temporal Lobe, Linear Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review