Beyond age and gender: relationships between cortical and subcortical brain volume and cognitive-motor abilities in school-age children
Open accessAbstract
There is growing evidence that cognitive and motor functions are interrelated and may rely on the development of the same cortical and subcortical neural structures. However, no study to date has examined the relationships between brain volume, cognitive ability, and motor ability in typically developing children. The NIH MRI Study of Normal Brain Development consists of a large, longitudinal database of structural MRI and performance measures from a battery of neuropsychological assessments from typically developing children. This dataset provides a unique opportunity to examine relationships between the brain and cognitive-motor abilities. A secondary analysis was conducted on data from 172 children between the ages of 6 to 13 years with up to 2 measurement occasions (initial testing and 2-year follow-up). Linear mixed effects modeling was employed to account for age and gender effects on the development of specific cortical and subcortical volumes as well as behavioral performance measures of interest. Above and beyond the effects of age and gender, significant relationships were found between general cognitive ability (IQ) and the volume of subcortical brain structures (cerebellum and caudate) as well as spatial working memory and the putamen. In addition, IQ was found to be related to global and frontal gray matter volume as well as parietal gray and white matter. At the behavioral level, general cognitive ability was also found to be related to visuomotor ability (pegboard) and executive function (spatial working memory). These results support the notion that cognition and motor skills may be fundamentally interrelated at both the levels of behavior and brain structure.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sex-related differences have been reported in structural brain maturation.
“Sex-related differences are noted in structural brain maturation (e.g. Lenroot et al., 2007; Pangelinan et al., 2011; Sowell et al., 2007).”
From A systematic review of fMRI reward paradigms used in studies of adolescents vs. adults: The impact of task design and implications for understanding neurodevelopment (2013) · cites this paper as Pangelinan et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 141
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- CeNeS 1998 Cambridge Neurological Test Automated Battery (Version 2.35) Cambridge, UK CeNeS Cognition
- Authors
- Pangelinan, M. M., Zhang, G., VanMeter, J. W., Clark, J. E., Hatfield, B. D., & Haufler, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pangelinan, Melissa M.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3093-3100
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3020257
- OpenAlex
- W1978789012
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 12.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (n01ns092319-000, n01ns092317-000, n01ns092320-002, n01ns92315-15-0-1, n01hd23343-8-0-0, n01ns092314-002, n01ns092316-000, n01mh90002-26-0-0)
- National Institute of Mental Health (N01-MH09-0002)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (N01-NS-9-2317, N01-NS-92319, N01-NS 92315, N01 NS092316, N01 NS092320, N01 NS092314, N01 NS092315, N01-NS 92316, N01 NS092317, N01 NS092319, N01 NS-9-2320)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (F31HD061210, F31HD612102, N01-HD023343)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
- Keywords
- brain volume, motor-cognitive relationship, elementary school students, subcortical structures, cerebellum, caudate nucleus, putamen, gray matter volume, white matter, spatial working memory, visuomotor abilities, executive function, IQ, brain development
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Age Factors, Brain, Child, Child Development, Cognition, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Skills, Neuropsychological Tests, Sex Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review