Cited by 141Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChildren's Physical and Motor Development

Beyond age and gender: relationships between cortical and subcortical brain volume and cognitive-motor abilities in school-age children

Open access
Pangelinan, Melissa M., Zhang, Guangyu, VanMeter, John W., Clark, Jane E., Hatfield, Bradley D., Haufler, Amy J.·2011·NeuroImage

Abstract

There is growing evidence that cognitive and motor functions are interrelated and may rely on the development of the same cortical and subcortical neural structures. However, no study to date has examined the relationships between brain volume, cognitive ability, and motor ability in typically developing children. The NIH MRI Study of Normal Brain Development consists of a large, longitudinal database of structural MRI and performance measures from a battery of neuropsychological assessments from typically developing children. This dataset provides a unique opportunity to examine relationships between the brain and cognitive-motor abilities. A secondary analysis was conducted on data from 172 children between the ages of 6 to 13 years with up to 2 measurement occasions (initial testing and 2-year follow-up). Linear mixed effects modeling was employed to account for age and gender effects on the development of specific cortical and subcortical volumes as well as behavioral performance measures of interest. Above and beyond the effects of age and gender, significant relationships were found between general cognitive ability (IQ) and the volume of subcortical brain structures (cerebellum and caudate) as well as spatial working memory and the putamen. In addition, IQ was found to be related to global and frontal gray matter volume as well as parietal gray and white matter. At the behavioral level, general cognitive ability was also found to be related to visuomotor ability (pegboard) and executive function (spatial working memory). These results support the notion that cognition and motor skills may be fundamentally interrelated at both the levels of behavior and brain structure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 141

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. CeNeS 1998 Cambridge Neurological Test Automated Battery (Version 2.35) Cambridge, UK CeNeS Cognition

Authors
Pangelinan, M. M., Zhang, G., VanMeter, J. W., Clark, J. E., Hatfield, B. D., & Haufler, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Pangelinan, Melissa M.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
3093-3100
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978789012
Cited by
141
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01ns092319-000, n01ns092317-000, n01ns092320-002, n01ns92315-15-0-1, n01hd23343-8-0-0, n01ns092314-002, n01ns092316-000, n01mh90002-26-0-0)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (N01-MH09-0002)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (N01-NS-9-2317, N01-NS-92319, N01-NS 92315, N01 NS092316, N01 NS092320, N01 NS092314, N01 NS092315, N01-NS 92316, N01 NS092317, N01 NS092319, N01 NS-9-2320)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (F31HD061210, F31HD612102, N01-HD023343)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
Keywords
brain volume, motor-cognitive relationship, elementary school students, subcortical structures, cerebellum, caudate nucleus, putamen, gray matter volume, white matter, spatial working memory, visuomotor abilities, executive function, IQ, brain development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Brain, Child, Child Development, Cognition, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Skills, Neuropsychological Tests, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review