Feature selection and classification of imbalanced datasets
Open accessAbstract
Learning with discriminative methods is generally based on minimizing the misclassification of training samples, which may be unsuitable for imbalanced datasets where the recognition might be biased in favor of the most numerous class. This problem can be addressed with a generative approach, which typically requires more parameters to be determined leading to reduced performances in high dimension. In such situations, dimension reduction becomes a crucial issue. We propose a feature selection/classification algorithm based on generative methods in order to predict the clinical status of a highly imbalanced dataset made of PET scans of forty-five low-functioning children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and thirteen non-ASD low functioning children. ASDs are typically characterized by impaired social interaction, narrow interests, and repetitive behaviors, with a high variability in expression and severity. The numerous findings revealed by brain imaging studies suggest that ASD is associated with a complex and distributed pattern of abnormalities that makes the identification of a shared and common neuroimaging profile a difficult task. In this context, our goal is to identify the rest functional brain imaging abnormalities pattern associated with ASD and to validate its efficiency in individual classification. The proposed feature selection algorithm detected a characteristic pattern in the ASD group that included a hypoperfusion in the right Superior Temporal Sulcus (STS) and a hyperperfusion in the contralateral postcentral area. Our algorithm allowed for a significantly accurate (88%), sensitive (91%) and specific (77%) prediction of clinical category. For this imbalanced dataset, with only 13 control scans, the proposed generative algorithm outperformed other state-of-the-art discriminant methods. The high predictive power of the characteristic pattern, which has been automatically identified on whole brains without any priors, confirms previous findings concerning the role of STS in ASD. This work offers exciting possibilities for early autism detection and/or the evaluation of treatment response in individual patients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Duchesnay et al. found that PET imaging could predict ASD with 88% accuracy in a sample of 26 participants.
“Duchesnay et al. found that PET imaging could be used to predict ASD with 88% accuracy in a sample of 26 participants 61.”
From Subtyping cognitive profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder using a Functional Random Forest algorithm (2018) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 60
- Authors
- Duchesnay, E., Cachia, A., Boddaert, N., Chabane, N., Mangin, J.-F., Martinot, J.-L., Brunelle, F., & Zilbovicius, M.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR)
- Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1003-1014
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W61461429
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- cea.hal.science
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- INSERM
- CEA
- National Agency for Research
- France Foundation
- Orange Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- feature selection, class imbalance, autism spectrum disorder, positron emission tomography, generative models, dimensionality reduction, superior temporal sulcus, cerebral hypoperfusion, clinical classification, early detection of autism, neuroimaging biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Male, Positron-Emission Tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review