Cited by 42Motor Control and AdaptationMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Remembering forward: Neural correlates of memory and prediction in human motor adaptation

Open access
Scheidt, Robert A., Zimbelman, Janice L., Salowitz, Nicole M.G., Suminski, Aaron J., Mosier, Kristine M., Houk, James, Simo, Lucia·2012·NeuroImage

Abstract

We used functional MR imaging (FMRI), a robotic manipulandum and systems identification techniques to examine neural correlates of predictive compensation for spring-like loads during goal-directed wrist movements in neurologically-intact humans. Although load changed unpredictably from one trial to the next, subjects nevertheless used sensorimotor memories from recent movements to predict and compensate upcoming loads. Prediction enabled subjects to adapt performance so that the task was accomplished with minimum effort. Population analyses of functional images revealed a distributed, bilateral network of cortical and subcortical activity supporting predictive load compensation during visual target capture. Cortical regions--including prefrontal, parietal and hippocampal cortices--exhibited trial-by-trial fluctuations in BOLD signal consistent with the storage and recall of sensorimotor memories or "states" important for spatial working memory. Bilateral activations in associative regions of the striatum demonstrated temporal correlation with the magnitude of kinematic performance error (a signal that could drive reward-optimizing reinforcement learning and the prospective scaling of previously learned motor programs). BOLD signal correlations with load prediction were observed in the cerebellar cortex and red nuclei (consistent with the idea that these structures generate adaptive fusimotor signals facilitating cancelation of expected proprioceptive feedback, as required for conditional feedback adjustments to ongoing motor commands and feedback error learning). Analysis of single subject images revealed that predictive activity was at least as likely to be observed in more than one of these neural systems as in just one. We conclude therefore that motor adaptation is mediated by predictive compensations supported by multiple, distributed, cortical and subcortical structures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.072

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 230 · Cited by 42

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Gilbert PFC Thach WT 1977 Brain Res 128 309 328 194656
  2. Hikosaka O Nakahara H Rand M Sakai K Lu X Nakamura K Miyachi S Doya K 1999 Trends Neurosci 22 464 471 10481194
  3. Houk JC Seth AK Bryson J Prescott TJ 2011 Chapter 8: Action selection and refinement in subcortical loops through basal ganglia and cerebellum Modeling Natural Action Selection Cambridge University Press
  4. Ito M 2000 Mechanisms of motor learning in the cerebellum Brain Res 886 237 245 11119699
  5. Rolls ET 1999 Spatial view cells and the representation of place in the primate hippocampus Hippocampus 9 467 480 10495028
  6. Schultz W Apicella P Ljungberg T 1993 Conditioned stimuli during successive steps of learning a delayed response task J Neurosci 13 3 900 913 8441015 PMC6576600

Authors
Scheidt, R. A., Zimbelman, J. L., Salowitz, N. M. G., Suminski, A. J., Mosier, K. M., Houk, J., & Simo, L.
Affiliations
  • Marquette University (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Scheidt, Robert A.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
582-600
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994316175
Cited by
42
References
230
Citations by year
2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (BES0238442)
  • National Institutes of Health (NICHHD R01HD053727, NINDS R01NS053581, NCRR GCRC M01RR00058)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
motor adaptation, predictive compensation, sensorimotor memory, load forecasting, BOLD signal, prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, hippocampus, striatum, cerebellum, red nucleus, proprioception, spatial working memory, reinforcement learning, distributed neural networks
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Movement, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review