Disentangling visual imagery and perception of real-world objects
Open accessAbstract
During mental imagery, visual representations can be evoked in the absence of "bottom-up" sensory input. Prior studies have reported similar neural substrates for imagery and perception, but studies of brain-damaged patients have revealed a double dissociation with some patients showing preserved imagery in spite of impaired perception and others vice versa. Here, we used fMRI and multi-voxel pattern analysis to investigate the specificity, distribution, and similarity of information for individual seen and imagined objects to try and resolve this apparent contradiction. In an event-related design, participants either viewed or imagined individual named object images on which they had been trained prior to the scan. We found that the identity of both seen and imagined objects could be decoded from the pattern of activity throughout the ventral visual processing stream. Further, there was enough correspondence between imagery and perception to allow discrimination of individual imagined objects based on the response during perception. However, the distribution of object information across visual areas was strikingly different during imagery and perception. While there was an obvious posterior-anterior gradient along the ventral visual stream for seen objects, there was an opposite gradient for imagined objects. Moreover, the structure of representations (i.e. the pattern of similarity between responses to all objects) was more similar during imagery than perception in all regions along the visual stream. These results suggest that while imagery and perception have similar neural substrates, they involve different network dynamics, resolving the tension between previous imaging and neuropsychological studies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Imagery can be decoded from early visual areas.
“studies using techniques to decode brain activity suggest that imagery can be decoded from early visual areas”
From Aphantasia and hyperphantasia: exploring imagery vividness extremes (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
Mental imagery partly depends on the same mechanisms as visual perception, in line with depictive accounts of mental representations.
“By showing that there is content-specific overlap of activation patterns during mental imagery and bottom-up visual stimulation in primary visual cortex, we show that mental imagery partly depends on the same mechanisms as visual perception, in line with depictive accounts of mental representations [20].”
From Shared representations for working memory and mental imagery in early visual cortex (2013) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 263
- Authors
- Lee, S.-H., Kravitz, D. J., & Baker, C. I.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Sue-Hyun
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 4064-4073
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3288657
- OpenAlex
- W2062103770
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NIMH
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- visual imagery, object perception, mental imagery, ventral stream, double dissociation, pattern similarity, neural correlates, object recognition, brain-damaged patients
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Imagination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review