Cited by 263Visual perception and processing mechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesFace Recognition and Perception

Disentangling visual imagery and perception of real-world objects

Open access
Lee, Sue-Hyun, Kravitz, Dwight J., Baker, Chris I.·2012·NeuroImage

Abstract

During mental imagery, visual representations can be evoked in the absence of "bottom-up" sensory input. Prior studies have reported similar neural substrates for imagery and perception, but studies of brain-damaged patients have revealed a double dissociation with some patients showing preserved imagery in spite of impaired perception and others vice versa. Here, we used fMRI and multi-voxel pattern analysis to investigate the specificity, distribution, and similarity of information for individual seen and imagined objects to try and resolve this apparent contradiction. In an event-related design, participants either viewed or imagined individual named object images on which they had been trained prior to the scan. We found that the identity of both seen and imagined objects could be decoded from the pattern of activity throughout the ventral visual processing stream. Further, there was enough correspondence between imagery and perception to allow discrimination of individual imagined objects based on the response during perception. However, the distribution of object information across visual areas was strikingly different during imagery and perception. While there was an obvious posterior-anterior gradient along the ventral visual stream for seen objects, there was an opposite gradient for imagined objects. Moreover, the structure of representations (i.e. the pattern of similarity between responses to all objects) was more similar during imagery than perception in all regions along the visual stream. These results suggest that while imagery and perception have similar neural substrates, they involve different network dynamics, resolving the tension between previous imaging and neuropsychological studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.055

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Imagery can be decoded from early visual areas.

    “studies using techniques to decode brain activity suggest that imagery can be decoded from early visual areas”
  • Mental imagery partly depends on the same mechanisms as visual perception, in line with depictive accounts of mental representations.

    “By showing that there is content-specific overlap of activation patterns during mental imagery and bottom-up visual stimulation in primary visual cortex, we show that mental imagery partly depends on the same mechanisms as visual perception, in line with depictive accounts of mental representations [20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 263

Authors
Lee, S.-H., Kravitz, D. J., & Baker, C. I.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Sue-Hyun
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
4064-4073
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062103770
Cited by
263
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
NIMH
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
visual imagery, object perception, mental imagery, ventral stream, double dissociation, pattern similarity, neural correlates, object recognition, brain-damaged patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Imagination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review