Cited by 71EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNumerical methods in inverse problemsNeural dynamics and brain function

A spatiotemporal dynamic distributed solution to the MEG inverse problem

Open access
Lamus, Camilo, Hämäläinen, Matti S., Temereanca, Simona, Brown, Emery N., Purdon, Patrick L.·2012·NeuroImage

Abstract

MEG/EEG are non-invasive imaging techniques that record brain activity with high temporal resolution. However, estimation of brain source currents from surface recordings requires solving an ill-conditioned inverse problem. Converging lines of evidence in neuroscience, from neuronal network models to resting-state imaging and neurophysiology, suggest that cortical activation is a distributed spatiotemporal dynamic process, supported by both local and long-distance neuroanatomic connections. Because spatiotemporal dynamics of this kind are central to brain physiology, inverse solutions could be improved by incorporating models of these dynamics. In this article, we present a model for cortical activity based on nearest-neighbor autoregression that incorporates local spatiotemporal interactions between distributed sources in a manner consistent with neurophysiology and neuroanatomy. We develop a dynamic maximum a posteriori expectation-maximization (dMAP-EM) source localization algorithm for estimation of cortical sources and model parameters based on the Kalman Filter, the Fixed Interval Smoother, and the EM algorithms. We apply the dMAP-EM algorithm to simulated experiments as well as to human experimental data. Furthermore, we derive expressions to relate our dynamic estimation formulas to those of standard static models, and show how dynamic methods optimally assimilate past and future data. Our results establish the feasibility of spatiotemporal dynamic estimation in large-scale distributed source spaces with several thousand source locations and hundreds of sensors, with resulting inverse solutions that provide substantial performance improvements over static methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.020

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 71

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Brockwell PJ Davis RA 2006 Time series: Theory and methods Springer New York 2
  2. Desai NU 2005 Souce localization for magnetoencephalography by spatio-temporal Kalman fitering and Fixed-Interval smoothing Master’s thesis Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  3. Kitagawa G Gersch W 1996 Smoothness priors analysis of time series Springer New York
  4. Moon TK Stirling WC 2000 Mathematical methods and algorithms for signal processing Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
  5. Nunez PL 1995 Neocortical dynamics and human EEG rhythms Oxford University Press USA

Authors
Lamus, C., Hämäläinen, M. S., Temereanca, S., Brown, E. N., & Purdon, P. L.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Lamus, Camilo
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
894-909
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2462525343
Cited by
71
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PMC
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1dp2od006454-01, DP1OD003646)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB006385)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Numerical methods in inverse problems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
MEG inverse problem, spatiotemporal dynamics, expectation-maximization algorithm, Kalman filter, source localization, ill-conditioned inverse problems, cortical activation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Models, Neurological, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetoencephalography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review