Dopaminergic stimulation facilitates working memory and differentially affects prefrontal low theta oscillations
Abstract
We used electroencephalography (EEG) together with psychopharmacological stimulation to investigate the role of dopamine in neural oscillations during working memory (WM). Following a within-subjects design, healthy humans either received the dopamine precursor L-Dopa (150 mg) or a placebo before they performed a Sternberg WM paradigm. Here, sequences of sample images had to be memorized for a delay of 5 s in three different load conditions (two, four or six items). On the next day, long-term memory (LTM) for the images was tested. Behaviorally, L-Dopa improved WM and LTM performance as a function of WM load. More precisely, there was a specific drug effect in the four-load condition with faster reaction times to the probe in the WM task and higher corrected hit-rates in the LTM task. During the maintenance period, there was a linear and quadratic effect of WM load on power in the high theta (5-8 Hz) and alpha (9-14 Hz) frequency range at frontal sensors. Importantly, a drug by load interaction--mimicking the behavioral results--was found only in low theta power (2-4 Hz). As such, our results indicate a specific link between prefrontal low theta oscillations, dopaminergic neuromodulation during WM and subsequent LTM performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dopaminergic neuromodulation might influence WM based on the specific task type and load.
“suggesting that dopaminergic neuromodulation might influence WM based on the specific task type and load.”
From Systematic reviews of the acute effects of amphetamine on working memory and other cognitive performances in healthy individuals, with a focus on the potential influence of personality traits (2023) · cites this paper as Eckart et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Eckart, C., Fuentemilla, L., Bauch, E. M., & Bunzeck, N.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- Bellvitge University Hospital (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Bunzeck, Nico
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 94
- Pages
- 185-192
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063108903
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Hamburg State Cluster of Excellence
- Ramon y Cajal program of the Spanish Government (PSI2010-15024)
- G.-A-Lienert Travel Award
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- dopamine, L-DOPA, working memory, prefrontal cortex, neural oscillations, long-term memory, memory load, neuromodulation, alpha oscillations, Sternberg task
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Biological Clocks, Brain Mapping, Dopamine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Levodopa, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Nerve Net, Task Performance and Analysis, Theta Rhythm, Dopamine Agents, Prefrontal Cortex, Long-Term Potentiation, Dopaminergic Neurons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review