Cited by 202Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

A novel matrix-similarity based loss function for joint regression and classification in ad diagnosis

Open access
Zhu, Xiaofeng, Suk, Heung-Il, Shen, Dinggang·2014·NeuroImage

Abstract

Recent studies on AD/MCI diagnosis have shown that the tasks of identifying brain disease and predicting clinical scores are highly related to each other. Furthermore, it has been shown that feature selection with a manifold learning or a sparse model can handle the problems of high feature dimensionality and small sample size. However, the tasks of clinical score regression and clinical label classification were often conducted separately in the previous studies. Regarding the feature selection, to our best knowledge, most of the previous work considered a loss function defined as an element-wise difference between the target values and the predicted ones. In this paper, we consider the problems of joint regression and classification for AD/MCI diagnosis and propose a novel matrix-similarity based loss function that uses high-level information inherent in the target response matrix and imposes the information to be preserved in the predicted response matrix. The newly devised loss function is combined with a group lasso method for joint feature selection across tasks, i.e., predictions of clinical scores and a class label. In order to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we conducted experiments on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset, and showed that the newly devised loss function helped enhance the performances of both clinical score prediction and disease status identification, outperforming the state-of-the-art methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.078

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Automatic computer-assisted diagnosis reduces errors caused by subjective judgment and provides a standardization tool to improve diagnosis efficiency.

    “Automatic computer-assisted diagnosis not only reduces errors caused by subjective judgment [8] but also provides an attractive and meaningful standardization tool [9 -11] to improve the ef fi ciency of diagnosis.”

    From DilatedFormer: dilated granularity transformer network for placental maturity grading in ultrasound (2023) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says machine-learning methods can efficiently analyze neuroimaging patterns for AD/MCI diagnosis, supporting the efficiency aspect of the claim. The paper does not describe computer-assisted diagnosis as a standardization tool or show that it reduces errors caused by subjective judgment; the latter point is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 202

Authors
Zhu, X., Suk, H.-I., & Shen, D.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Shen, Dinggang
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
100
Pages
91-105
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017237939
Cited by
202
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5
FWCI
20.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (EB006733, EB008374, EB009634, AG041721, AG042599, MH100217)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61263035)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, mild cognitive impairment, clinical score prediction, group lasso, brain disease classification, ADNI dataset
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mathematical Computing, Prognosis, Radionuclide Imaging, Neuroimaging, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review